Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
Published on: September 25, 2014
Comparison of Methods for Classifying Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms in Children
Andrew R Mayer1,2,3,4, David D Stephenson1, Andrew B Dodd1
1The Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Insights
Defining persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) is challenging due to varying methods and symptom overlap in healthy children. Current definitions show significant variability, questioning their clinical utility.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Pediatric Medicine
- Psychology
Background:
- Pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) is a growing public health concern, particularly for children with persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS).
- Existing clinical and scientific literature presents multiple, often inconsistent, methods for defining PPCS.
- Healthy children frequently exhibit symptoms similar to those experienced after a concussion, complicating diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the inter-method agreement, misclassification rates, and psychometric properties of six different PPCS definition methods.
- To compare these methods in adolescent patients with pmTBI and age/sex-matched healthy controls (HC).
- To assess the reliability and potential biases in symptom reporting over time.
Main Methods:
- Six published PPCS methods were categorized into Simple Change and Standardized Change algorithms.
- Adolescent pmTBI patients (n=162) and HC (n=117) were assessed 1 week and 4 months post-injury.
- Test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and misclassification rates were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Healthy children showed fair to good test-retest reliability over 4 months, but with evidence of rating bias.
- Simple Change algorithms resulted in higher misclassification rates (>30%) in HC and poor inter-rater reliability.
- A wide variation (49% spread) in PPCS diagnosis was observed among pmTBI patients at 4 months, with better agreement for Standardized Change algorithms.
Conclusions:
- Self-reported symptoms in adolescents have modest reliability over 4 months, with systematic bias in both self and parental ratings.
- The variability in identifying PPCS challenges the accurate estimation of its incidence in published research.
- The clinical utility of commonly used Simple Change scores for diagnosing PPCS is questionable.
Abstract:
Pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) has received increased public scrutiny over the past decade, especially regarding children who experience persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). However, several methods for defining PPCS exist in clinical and scientific literature, and even healthy children frequently exhibit non-specific, concussive-like symptoms. Inter-method agreement (six PPCS methods), observed misclassification rates, and other psychometric properties were examined in large cohorts of consecutively recruited adolescent patients with pmTBI (n = 162) 1 week and 4 months post-injury and in age/sex-matched healthy controls (HC; n = 117) at equivalent time intervals. Six published PPCS methods were stratified into Simple Change (e.g., International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision [ICD-10]) and Standardized Change (e.g., reliable change indices) algorithms. Among HC, test-retest reliability was fair to good across the 4-month assessment window, with evidence of bias (i.e., higher symptom ratings) during retrospective relative to other assessments. Misclassification rates among HC were higher (>30%) for Simple Change algorithms, with poor inter-rater reliability of symptom burden across HC and their parents. A 49% spread existed in terms of the proportion of pmTBI patients "diagnosed" with PPCS at 4 months, with superior inter-method agreement among standardized change algorithms. In conclusion, the self-reporting of symptom burden is only modestly reliable in typically developing adolescents over a 4-month period, with additional evidence for systematic bias in both adolescent and parental ratings. Significant variation existed for identifying pmTBI patients who had "recovered" (i.e., those who did not meet individual criteria for PPCS) from concussion across the six definitions, representing a considerable challenge for estimating the true incidence rate of PPCS in published literature. Although relatively straightforward to obtain, current findings question the utility of the most commonly used Simple Change scores for diagnosis of PPCS in clinical settings.
More Related Videos
07:02An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System
Published on: January 12, 2011
11:32A Neuroscientific Approach to the Examination of Concussions in Student-Athletes
Published on: December 8, 2014