Meta-analysis Comparing Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists After Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Hiroki Ueyama1, Toshiki Kuno1, Tomo Ando2

  • 1Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York.

Insights

For patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a need for oral anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) show similar safety and efficacy to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). This meta-analysis found no significant differences in mortality, bleeding, or stroke between DOACs and VKAs in this patient group.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
  • The comparative safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in TAVI patients requiring oral anticoagulation is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of DOACs against VKAs in patients undergoing TAVI who have an indication for oral anticoagulation.
  • To evaluate key outcomes including mortality, stroke, and major bleeding events.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE up to October 2019.
  • Meta-analysis of 5 eligible studies involving 2,569 patients who underwent TAVI and required oral anticoagulation.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI [0.73-1.57]) between DOACs and VKAs.
  • Major and/or life-threatening bleeding events were similar between the two anticoagulant groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.64-1.12]).
  • Stroke incidence did not differ significantly between patients treated with DOACs and VKAs (OR 1.52, 95% CI [0.93-2.48]).

Conclusions:

  • In TAVI patients requiring oral anticoagulation, DOACs and VKAs demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy profiles.
  • Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the optimal oral anticoagulation strategy for this population.

Related Concept Videos

Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants01:18

Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Oral anticoagulants are vital tools in preventing and treating blood clotting disorders. This diverse class of medications can be categorized as vitamin K antagonists, exemplified by warfarin, and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as dabigatran, as well as factor Xa inhibitors, including rivaroxaban.
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
1.9K
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care01:29

Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

Venous thrombosis requires effective prevention and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential complications.Prevention StrategiesHealthcare providers must prioritize preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) for all adult patients upon admission. Interventions depend on bleeding and thrombosis risk, medical history, current medications, diagnoses, planned procedures, and patient preferences. Patients on bed rest should change positions every two hours and, if not...
234
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins01:30

Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

Hemostasis is a crucial process that prevents excessive blood loss from damaged blood vessels. It involves various mechanisms such as vasoconstriction, platelet adhesion and activation, and fibrin formation. The importance of each mechanism depends on the type of vessel injury. In contrast, thrombosis is the abnormal formation of a blood clot within the blood vessels, leading to potential complications if the clot obstructs blood flow. Thrombosis can be caused by increased coagulability of the...
1.5K