Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
A Competing Risk Analysis Study of Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma 2006-2015 Using Data from the
Zhaohua Yu1,2, Jin Yang3,4, Lei Gao1,2
1Department of Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China (mainland).
Abstract:
BACKGROUND Competing risk analysis determines the probability of survival and considers competing events. This retrospective study aimed to undertake a competing risk analysis of prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma between 2006-2015 using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinicopathological, demographic, and survival data were analyzed for patients with esophageal carcinoma registered in the SEER database between 2006-2015. The competing risk model calculated the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of events of interest and prognosis. The Cox proportional-hazards model and the cause-specific hazard function (CS) were used to generalize the hazard function for competing risks. The Fine-Gray model was used for multivariate analysis. More accurate prognostic factors were analyzed by comparing the hazard ratio (HR) values between groups. RESULTS There were 14,695 patients identified with esophageal carcinoma, 9,621 died from esophageal carcinoma, and 1,251 patients died from other causes. The cumulative incidence of events of interest was significant for age at diagnosis, race, primary tumor site, grade, stage, and treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis, primary tumor site, grade, stage, and treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy statuses were independent prognostic factors (P<0.05). The Fine-Gray and the CS model showed that grade, stage, and treatments with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were significant independent prognostic factors (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS A competing risk model used data from the SEER database to obtain a more accurate estimate of the CIF of esophageal carcinoma-specific mortality and prognostic factors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...

