Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
The reliability of self-reporting chronic diseases: how reliable is the result of population-based cohort studies
F Najafi1, M Moradinazar1, B Hamzeh1
1Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Insights
Self-reporting chronic diseases in the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort study showed good reliability for many conditions. This suggests self-reported data can be valuable for certain chronic disease research.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Chronic Disease Research
Background:
- Reliable data collection is crucial for epidemiological studies.
- Self-reporting is a common method for gathering health information in cohort studies.
- The accuracy of self-reported chronic diseases needs validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reliability of self-reported chronic diseases.
- To evaluate baseline data from the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort study.
- To determine the validity of self-reported conditions in a western Iranian population.
Main Methods:
- A random sample of 202 participants from the RaNCD cohort study was re-assessed.
- Participants were queried about chronic conditions 30-35 days post-recruitment.
- Kappa statistics were used to measure agreement for self-reported diseases.
Main Results:
- Kappa agreement ranged from 39.52% to 100%.
- Lower reliability was observed for hypertension and hepatitis.
- Higher reliability was found for cancer, cardiac ischemia, and diabetes.
Conclusions:
- Self-reporting of chronic diseases demonstrated relative reliability in the RaNCD cohort.
- Self-reported data can be utilized for specific chronic conditions when validity is acceptable.
- Findings support the use of self-reported data in certain public health research contexts.
Objectives:
To evaluate the reliability of self-reporting chronic diseases in the baseline data of the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort study in Kermanshah province, western Iran.
Methods:
The study was conducted in RaNCD cohort study. To assess the reliability of self-report of chronic disease, a random sample of 202 participants were asked about some of chronic conditions 30-35 days (mean = 32) after recruitment.
Results:
A range of kappa agreement between 39.52-100%, which the lower statistics was for hypertension and hepatitis and the higher one for cancer, cardiac ischemic, and diabetes.
Conclusion:
The self-report of chronic diseases was relatively reliable. Therefore self-reporting data for some conditions can be used in situations where the validity is acceptable.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Introduction to Epidemiology

