Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

08:53
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.5K
Crowdsourced Research: Vulnerability, Autonomy, and Exploitation.
1Senior lecturer in the Centre for University Core at the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
Ethics & Human Research
|January 23, 2020
Summary
Crowd workers in research are not always vulnerable due to autonomy issues. Exploitation offers a better ethical framework for evaluating crowdsourced research participant protocols.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Behavioral Sciences
- Educational Research
Background:
- Crowd workers are increasingly used in research.
- Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) face more crowdsourced research protocols.
- Ethical considerations for crowd worker participants require clear guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the vulnerability of crowd workers in research.
- To develop a heuristic for ethical evaluation of crowdsourced research protocols.
- To propose an alternative ethical framework for crowdsourced research.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of threats to crowd worker autonomy (undue inducements, dependent relationships).
- Application of Alan Wertheimer's exploitation framework.
- Case study using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform.
Main Results:
- Autonomy-based arguments regarding inducements and relationships are inconclusive for crowd workers.
- Exploitation framework provides a more applicable lens for ethical evaluation.
- Identified specific suggestions for ethical reviewers.
Conclusions:
- Rethinking ethical evaluation of crowdsourced research is necessary.
- The exploitation framework offers a robust approach to protect crowd workers.
- Provides practical guidance for IRBs and researchers in crowdsourced studies.
Related Concept Videos
Deindividuation
30.1K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.1K
Ethics in Research
25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
139
Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
139
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
236
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
236
Social Traps
26.2K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.2K
Social Exchange Theory
39.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
39.4K

