Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

08:06
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
Published on: August 15, 2010
15.1K
Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
Leslie Tricoche1, Johan Ferrand-Verdejo1, Denis Pélisson1
1INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, ImpAct Team, University Lyon, Bron, France.
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|January 24, 2020
Summary
The mere presence of a familiar peer can impact eye movements, specifically saccades, by either inhibiting or facilitating performance based on task difficulty. This social facilitation effect on attention and decision-making mechanisms was observed in saccade tasks but not in visual search or continuous performance tasks.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Social facilitation, the impact of others' presence on performance, is well-documented for various behaviors.
- Its influence on attention and eye movements, crucial components of cognitive processing, remains less understood.
- Understanding social modulation of eye movements can elucidate underlying decision-making mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether social facilitation affects attention and eye movements.
- To determine which decision-making mechanisms are influenced by the presence of a familiar peer.
- To examine social influences on saccades, visual search, and continuous performance tasks.
Main Methods:
- Human volunteers performed saccade, visual search, and continuous performance tasks.
- Tasks were conducted both in isolation and in the presence of a familiar peer.
- Reaction times and eye movement metrics (peak velocity) were analyzed, with LATER model used for RT distributions.
Main Results:
- No significant social influence was found for visual search or continuous performance tasks.
- Saccade performance showed mixed results: inhibition in a complex mixed protocol and facilitation when performed separately.
- Peer presence significantly affected reaction times and peak saccade velocity, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d: 0.50-0.95).
Conclusions:
- Social facilitation modulates saccade initiation and execution, with effects contingent on task complexity.
- The presence of a peer can alter decision-making processes, influencing both top-down and bottom-up attention.
- Future research should explore task difficulty's role in social modulation of attention and eye movements.

