Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
First steps toward an understanding of procedural fairness
Luca Surian1, Francesco Margoni1
1Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Twenty-month-old infants noticed unfairness in how help was given. They looked longer at biased scenarios, suggesting an early understanding of procedural fairness.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Social Cognition
- Infant Studies
Background:
- Understanding fairness is crucial for social development.
- Research has explored fairness in adults, but less is known about infants' sensitivity to procedural impartiality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether 20-month-old infants can detect violations of procedural impartiality.
- To explore the early development of fairness understanding in human infants.
Main Methods:
- Infants were presented with video scenarios depicting impartial and biased help distribution.
- Help was provided either simultaneously (impartial) or with significant delays to one recipient (biased).
- Looking time was measured to assess infant attention to different scenarios.
Main Results:
- Infants looked significantly longer at scenarios with biased help distribution compared to impartial ones.
- This difference in attention occurred even when both recipients eventually received help.
Conclusions:
- 20-month-old infants are sensitive to departures from impartiality in help provision.
- This indicates an emerging understanding of procedural fairness in the second year of life.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
08:42A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Halo Effect
Ethics in Research
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
The Representativeness Heuristic