Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis
Tamara Waldron1, Tracey Carr1, Linda McMullen2
1Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
This study developed a program theory for Shared Decision-making (SDM), explaining how patient and provider engagement in SDM works, for whom, and in which situations. It identifies key contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes to improve healthcare decisions.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Decision Science
- Patient Engagement
Background:
- Shared Decision-making (SDM) emerged to counter paternalistic healthcare models, aiming to better align medical choices with patient needs.
- Despite extensive research on SDM benefits, a comprehensive theory explaining its underlying mechanisms, contextual factors, and target populations remains limited.
- Understanding the nuances of SDM is crucial for optimizing patient-centered care and improving health outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the gap in theoretical understanding of Shared Decision-making (SDM).
- To investigate the specific situations, mechanisms, and individual factors that influence effective SDM between patients and healthcare providers.
- To develop a program theory that explains how SDM contributes to improved engagement in the decision-making process.
Main Methods:
- A seven-step realist synthesis methodology was employed, adhering to RAMESES guidelines.
- The process involved preliminary program theory development, comprehensive literature searches, rigorous selection and appraisal of studies, data extraction, and formal theory identification.
- Expert consultations and stakeholder input were integrated to refine the program theory.
Main Results:
- A program theory for SDM was developed, encompassing three key contexts: pre-existing patient-provider relationships, decision complexity, and healthcare system support.
- Eight sets of mechanisms were identified, including patient and provider trust, self-efficacy, perception of capacity, anxiety, world view, and recognition of the decision.
- The primary outcome identified was enhanced engagement in the Shared Decision-making process.
Conclusions:
- This research presents the first program theory to explicate the 'how,' 'for whom,' 'in which circumstances,' and 'why' of Shared Decision-making (SDM).
- The identified contexts and mechanisms provide a framework for understanding factors that facilitate or hinder SDM, aiding healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patients.
- While further research is recommended, this theory offers a foundational understanding of SDM's operational principles.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

