Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.1K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.1K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.9K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.9K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.2K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.7K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.0K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prenatal NSAIDs exposure and childhood kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026
Same author

Identifying the Best Predictive Biomarker in Pharmacogenomics Through Multiple Comparisons With the Best.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Cumulative evidence for the association between maternal hypertension and cleft lip and palate in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in oral health·2026
Same author

PIN2-mediated self-organizing transient auxin flow contributes to auxin maxima at the tip of Arabidopsis cotyledons.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Establishment of LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a for rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and one-pot detection.

Food microbiology·2024
Same author

Characterization and transmission of plasmid-mediated multidrug resistance in foodborne <i>Vibrio parahaemolyticus</i>.

Frontiers in microbiology·2024
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

Constructing confidence intervals for selected parameters.

Haibing Zhao1, Xinping Cui2

  • 1School of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Biometrics
|January 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces two novel methods for constructing shorter confidence intervals (CIs) that control the false coverage-statement rate (FCR). These selective CIs offer an improvement over existing methods for large-scale data analysis.

Keywords:
BH procedureconfidence levelfalse coverage-statement rateselective confidence interval

More Related Videos

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

17.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

17.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical inference
  • Bioinformatics
  • High-dimensional data analysis

Background:

  • Controlling the false coverage-statement rate (FCR) is crucial in large-scale statistical problems.
  • Existing Benjamini and Hochberg (BY) confidence intervals (CIs) control FCR but are often uniformly inflated.
  • There is a need for more efficient CIs in high-dimensional settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose two novel methods for constructing shorter selective confidence intervals.
  • To theoretically and numerically demonstrate the superiority of the proposed CIs over BY CIs.
  • To apply the proposed methods to real-world data, such as microarray data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of two distinct methods for constructing selective CIs.
  • Method 1: Shortens CIs by allowing a reduced number of selected intervals.
  • Method 2: Shortens CIs by permitting a proportion of intervals to cover uninteresting parameters.
  • Theoretical analysis for asymptotic FCR control in independent data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed selective CIs are theoretically proven to be uniformly shorter than BY CIs.
  • Asymptotic control of FCR is demonstrated for independent data.
  • Numerical simulations confirm theoretical findings and show effectiveness for correlated data.
  • Successful application to HIV study microarray data highlights practical utility.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methods provide shorter selective CIs while maintaining FCR control.
  • These methods offer a valuable alternative to standard BY CIs in large-scale statistical analyses.
  • The approach is robust and applicable to both independent and correlated data, demonstrating practical advantages.