Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test
Published on: November 23, 2019
Translation and psychometric testing of a decision-making scale
Chongmei Huang1, Virginia Plummer2, Louisa Lam3
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
Abstract:
WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT SHARED DECISION-MAKING?: There is increasing investigation of shared decision-making in mental health services. Exploration of shared decision-making and relevant instrument is scant in China. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: In this study, the Clinical Decision-making Involvement and Satisfaction (CDIS) was translated into Chinese and validated with patients and mental health professionals. The Chinese version of the CDIS is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring perception of involvement and satisfaction with treatment decision for schizophrenia WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Mental health nurses could use the CDIS patient-rated and health professional-rated versions to compare their perceptions of the decision-making process. ABSTRACT: Introduction There is growing interest in shared decision-making in Chinese mental health services. However, few specific instruments are available to measure decision-making satisfaction and involvement. Aim To translate and validate Clinical Decision-making Involvement and Satisfaction (CDIS) in a Chinese population. Methods The translation process was completed based on the Brislin translation method. Convenience sampling of 505 participants including 212 people diagnosed with schizophrenia and 293 mental health professionals for psychometric testing (e.g., content and construct validity, and test-retest reliability). Results The CDIS Chinese version has good internal consistency and temporal stability. Factor analysis determined two factors including satisfaction and involvement subscales, explaining 60.08% of the total variance. The Cronbach's α was 0.70, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.83 to 0.89. The composite reliability value was 0.85, and the average variance extracted was 0.50. Critical Ratio values ranged from 5.28 to 17.95, and item-total correlation values ranged from 0.48 to 0.75. Discussion The CDIS Chinese version is a feasible and reliable instrument.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

