Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

10:52
Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
Published on: September 11, 2021
5.7K
Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
S Gogna1, R Latifi2, A Policastro3
1Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Taylor Pavilion, E-348, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery
|January 26, 2020
Summary
Elderly patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) with biological mesh show similar outcomes to younger patients. Propensity score matching confirmed comparable complication rates, reoperations, and hospital stays between age groups.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Geriatric Surgery
- Biomaterials in Medicine
Background:
- Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) is increasingly performed in both elderly and non-elderly patient populations.
- The safety and efficacy of CAWR in elderly individuals compared to younger counterparts require thorough investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of elderly versus non-elderly patients undergoing CAWR.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of porcine-derived, non-crosslinked acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in CAWR across different age groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 136 patients who underwent CAWR using Strattice™ (porcine ADM) between 2014 and 2017.
- Propensity score matching was employed for risk adjustment and one-to-one matching to compare elderly (≥65 years) and non-elderly (18-64 years) cohorts.
- Outcomes assessed included postoperative complications, reoperations, mortality, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition.
Main Results:
- After propensity score matching (35 pairs), no significant differences were observed in surgical site infection, wound necrosis, or need for mechanical ventilation.
- Mortality rates, reoperation rates, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition were also similar between the elderly and non-elderly groups.
- The study included 70% non-elderly and 30% elderly patients, with 56.7% females.
Conclusions:
- Elderly patients undergoing CAWR with biological mesh (porcine ADM) demonstrate comparable outcomes to non-elderly patients.
- Propensity score matching is a valuable tool for risk adjustment, enabling fair comparison of surgical outcomes across age groups.
- These findings support the use of biological mesh in CAWR for elderly patients.

