Comparison of statistical machine learning models for rectal protocol compliance in prostate external beam radiation
Scott Jones1,2, Catriona Hargrave1,3, Timothy Deegan1,3
1Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, Qld, 4101, Australia.
Medical Physics
|January 26, 2020
Summary
Machine learning models effectively predict rectal dose compliance in prostate cancer radiation therapy. Logistic regression and random forest models show promise for identifying patients at risk of rectal injury.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Machine Learning in Healthcare
Background:
- External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer necessitates limiting rectal dose to prevent injury.
- Hydrogel spacers can improve rectal sparing, but predicting dose compliance remains a challenge.
- Identifying patients at higher risk of rectal injury pre-treatment is crucial for optimizing EBRT planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of statistical machine learning models in predicting rectal dosimetry compliance before EBRT simulation.
- To compare the performance of logistic regression, classification and regression trees, and random forest models.
- To assess the impact of different classification thresholds on model performance for rectal dose outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Treated 176 prostate cancer patients with conventionally fractionated EBRT (74-78 Gy).
- Quantified rectal dose-volume histogram data (V50%, V83%, V96%, V102%) and classified patients based on tolerance thresholds.
- Compared logistic regression, classification and regression tree, and random forest models using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV across 50%, 10%, and optimal thresholds.
Main Results:
- Logistic regression achieved the highest AUC (0.844) at the V83% dose level; random forest performed best at V96% (AUC=0.733).
- A conservative clinical threshold of 10% maximized sensitivity for V83% and V96% across all models.
- Logistic regression and random forest models demonstrated good discriminative ability, especially at higher dose levels and with a 10% threshold.
Conclusions:
- Statistical machine learning models are effective for predicting rectal protocol compliance in prostate cancer EBRT planning.
- Logistic regression and random forest models show strong performance in predicting rectal dose outcomes.
- A conservative clinical threshold enhances model sensitivity, confirming the value of these ML approaches over classification and regression trees.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
20.9K
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
8.6K
