Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Assisted Cycle Therapy (ACT) Improved Self-Efficacy and Exercise Perception in Middle-Age Adults with Down Syndrome.

Brain sciences·2023

Same author

Effects of Flywheel Resistance Training on Muscle Function and Sport-Specific Performance in Collegiate Club Water Polo Players.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2022

Same author

Preliminary Evidence That Motor Planning Is Slower and More Difficult for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder During Motor Cooperation.

Motor control·2019

Same author

Concussion history is negatively associated with visual-motor force complexity: evidence for persistent effects on visual-motor integration.

Brain injury·2018

Same author

The role of multiple internal timekeepers and sources of feedback on interval timing.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2017

Same journal

Poorer event-based compared to time-based prospective memory in a computerized household chores task.

Psychological research·2026

Same journal

Self-other discrimination in face recognition depending on personal familiarity: investigating a sample consisting of Japanese and Han Chinese women.

Psychological research·2026

Same journal

Sounds of creativity: musical, creative, and language factors associated with singing and creative singing.

Psychological research·2026

Same journal

Does sport expertise bridge the sex gap in mental rotation? Bayesian evidence for the critical role of visuospatial demands.

Psychological research·2026

Same journal

The development of an optimal learning strategy for high-similarity categories: the effect of example sequence on children's category learning.

Psychological research·2026

Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.

Breanna E Studenka¹, Daisha L Cummins², Kodey Myers²

¹Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, 7000 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84242, USA. breanna.studenka@usu.edu.

Psychological Research

|January 27, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Bimanual tapping reduces timing variability, but this bimanual advantage is not due to visual feedback. Sensory feedback, not vision, plays a key role in improving bimanual timing accuracy.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Neuroscience
Human motor control

Background:

Bimanual tapping exhibits reduced temporal variability compared to unimanual tapping, known as the bimanual advantage.
The multiple-timekeeper model suggests coupled internal clocks explain this advantage.
An alternative hypothesis posits increased sensory feedback from two limbs contributes to reduced variability.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the specific role of visual feedback in the bimanual advantage.
To differentiate between the multiple-timekeeper model and sensory feedback explanations for improved bimanual timing.

Main Methods:

Participants performed unimanual and bimanual tapping tasks under varying visual conditions: full vision, blindfolded, and with mirror feedback.
Temporal variability was measured to assess timing accuracy.
A control condition used a mirror to provide visual feedback of the non-tapping hand.

Main Results:

Visual feedback, whether direct or indirect (mirror), did not significantly reduce temporal variability during bimanual tapping.
No significant difference in temporal variability was observed between conditions with and without vision.
The bimanual advantage persisted regardless of visual input manipulation.

Conclusions:

Visual feedback is not the primary factor driving the bimanual advantage in timing.
Findings support the importance of non-visual sensory feedback (tactile, auditory, proprioceptive) in enhancing bimanual timing.
The results challenge a purely multiple-timekeeper model and highlight the role of integrated sensory information.