Workplace Well-Being Factors That Predict Employee Participation, Health and Medical Cost Impact, and Perceived
Jessica Grossmeier1, Patricia H Castle2, Jennifer S Pitts3
1Health Enhancement Research Organization, MN, USA.
Organizational and leadership support are key drivers for employee participation and health outcomes in well-being programs. Incentives alone are insufficient for achieving significant downstream results.
Area of Science:
- Workplace health and well-being
- Organizational psychology
- Health promotion
Background:
- Employee well-being programs are increasingly implemented by organizations.
- Understanding the factors that drive program success is crucial for optimizing investments.
- Previous research has explored various components of these programs, but comprehensive analysis of their impact on multiple outcomes is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationships between health and well-being best practices and organizational outcomes.
- To identify the key predictors of participation, health and medical cost impact, and perceived organizational support.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of organizational support, program comprehensiveness, integration, and incentives.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study utilizing data from the HERO Scorecard Benchmark Database.
- Analysis of survey responses from 812 organizations collected between January 2015 and October 2017.
- Development and application of three structural equation models to assess variable relationships.
Main Results:
- Organizational and leadership support emerged as the strongest predictor for participation, impact, and perceived support.
- Incentives positively influenced participation in specific activities like health assessments and biometric screenings.
- Program comprehensiveness and integration were not found to be significant predictors of the studied outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Strong organizational and leadership support are critical for successful well-being program outcomes.
- While incentives can drive initial engagement, they are insufficient for achieving broader health and cost impacts.
- The study design, while robust, limits the ability to establish causal relationships.
More Related Videos
07:20Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
10:45A Community-based Stress Management Program: Using Wearable Devices to Assess Whole Body Physiological Responses in Non-laboratory Settings
Published on: January 22, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques I
Conscientiousness
Conscientious individuals tend to be organized, responsible, and disciplined. They prioritize completing tasks and following structured routines,...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
