Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomechanical evaluation of a laxity-minimizing suture for rotator cuff repair.

JSES reviews, reports, and techniques·2026
Same author

A predictive simulation framework for personalised in silico gait retraining in knee osteoarthritis.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Incidence of radiographic humeral bone remodeling after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and its impact on clinical outcome.

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty·2026
Same author

High-throughput multiplex immunoassay for the detection of mpox and MVA-BN vaccination up to 2 years after exposure in Belgium: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.

The Lancet. Microbe·2026
Same author

Ocular manifestations in a cohort of patients with mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 2007-2011.

ASM case reports·2026
Same author

Altered gait strategies show inconsistent medial compartment unloading in varus medial knee osteoarthritis awaiting high tibial osteotomy.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.6K

Automated quantification of glenoid bone defects using 3-dimensional measurements.

Katrien Plessers1, Filip Verhaegen2, Christophe Van Dijck1

  • 1Biomechanics Section, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium.

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|January 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an automated 3D method for assessing glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty, eliminating the need for a contralateral scapula. The technique accurately quantifies bone defects, aiding surgical planning.

Keywords:
Glenoid bone defectsautomatizationdefect measurementspreoperative planningshoulder arthroplastystatistical shape modeling

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
08:18

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

561
Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

488

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.6K
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
08:18

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

561
Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

488

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Medical imaging
  • Biomechanical analysis

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of glenoid bone defects is crucial for shoulder arthroplasty.
  • Current methods may require a healthy contralateral scapula, limiting applicability.
  • This study addresses the need for an automated, self-contained method for glenoid bone loss evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a fully automated 3D method for quantifying glenoid bone defects.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of this method compared to a traditional contralateral bone-based approach.
  • To provide a reliable tool for shoulder arthroplasty planning without contralateral reference.

Main Methods:

  • Reconstruction of the native glenoid shape using a statistical shape model (SSM) of the scapula.
  • Computation of various defect parameters including vault loss, depth, area, and subluxation.
  • Validation against a contralateral bone-based reconstruction method using 34 scapula-humerus pairs.

Main Results:

  • The SSM-based method showed high agreement with the contralateral approach for most parameters.
  • Mean absolute differences were 5.5% (total vault loss), 4.5-8.0% (local vault loss), 1.9 mm (depth), and 1.6 mm (subluxation).
  • Statistical equivalence was achieved for all parameters except defect area percentage.

Conclusions:

  • The developed automated method effectively analyzes glenoid bone defects using 3D measurements.
  • It does not require a healthy contralateral bone, offering a significant advantage.
  • This technique enhances the planning and implantation of shoulder arthroplasty components.