Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Understanding Deception

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Groupthink

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Information-Theoretic Concepts in Physics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

The genetic technologies questionnaire: lay judgments about genetic technologies align with ethical theory, are coherent, and predict behaviour.

BMC medical ethics·2022

Same author

Deliberation and confidence change.

Synthese·2022

Same journal

Can Evidential Pluralism mitigate bias and motivated reasoning?

Synthese·2026

Same journal

AI-assisted rational decision-making.

Synthese·2026

Same journal

Technological Understanding: On the cognitive skill involved in the design and use of technological artefacts.

Synthese·2026

Same journal

Addictive Motivational Scaffolds and the Structure of Social Media.

Synthese·2026

Same journal

When do we experience effort?

Synthese·2026

Same journal

Prescriptive 'selves' and self-illness ambiguity.

Synthese·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Voting, deliberation and truth.

Stephan Hartmann¹, Soroush Rafiee Rad²

¹1Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany.

|January 28, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Group deliberation can lead to truthful decisions, similar to majority voting. Research shows specific conditions where deliberation is epistemically superior for achieving accurate group consensus.

Keywords:

Deliberation model Group consensus Rational deliberation Voting

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Area of Science:

Social Choice Theory
Epistemology
Collective Decision-Making

Background:

Majority voting, supported by the Condorcet Jury Theorem, is a common method for group decisions on factual questions.
Consensus-based deliberation offers universal endorsement but faces challenges in implementation and potential divergence from truth.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether deliberation is as truth-conducive as majority voting.
To identify conditions under which deliberation is epistemically preferable to voting.

Main Methods:

Development of a highly idealized model of deliberation, inspired by "Twelve Angry Men".
Utilizing agent-based simulations to analyze the model.

Main Results:

Demonstrated that deliberation procedures can be truth-conducive.
Identified specific contexts where deliberation is epistemically superior to voting.

Conclusions:

Deliberation is a viable and potentially superior method for achieving truthful group decisions.
Understanding the conditions favoring deliberation over voting is crucial for optimizing collective decision-making processes.