Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication
Published on: June 5, 2016
Nuthatches vary their alarm calls based upon the source of the eavesdropped signals
Nora V Carlson1,2,3, Erick Greene4, Christopher N Templeton5
1Department of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, D-78457, Konstanz, Germany. nora.v.carlson@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Animal alarm calls can contain detailed information about a predator's threat, and heterospecific eavesdropping on these signals creates vast communication networks. While eavesdropping is common, this indirect public information is often less reliable than direct predator observations. Red-breasted nuthatches (Sitta canadensis) eavesdrop on chickadee mobbing calls and vary their behaviour depending on the threat encoded in those calls. Whether nuthatches propagate this indirect information in their own calls remains unknown. Here we test whether nuthatches propagate direct (high and low threat raptor vocalizations) or indirect (high and low threat chickadee mobbing calls) information about predators differently. When receiving direct information, nuthatches vary their mobbing calls to reflect the predator's threat. However, when nuthatches obtain indirect information, they produce calls with intermediate acoustic features, suggesting a more generic alarm signal. This suggests nuthatches are sensitive to the source and reliability of information and selectively propagate information in their own mobbing calls.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Types of Selection
Optimal Foraging
The Cochlea
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule
Conservation of Declining Populations

