Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On not harming: two traditions.

B MacKinnon1

  • 1University of San Francisco, Ignatian Heights, San Francisco, Calif. 94117.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Postpartum magnesium status as an important risk factor for delayed and persistent subclinical hypocalcaemia in grazing Holstein cattle.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2026
Same author

Collection and determinants of patient reported outcome measures in haemodialysis patients in Scotland.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2017
Same author

Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in Scotland.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2014
Same author

The relationship between serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate: implications for clinical practice.

Scottish medical journal·2006
Same author

The link between circulating markers of endothelial function and proteinuria in patients with primary glomerulonephritis.

Clinical nephrology·2005
Same author

Predictors of the post-thrombotic syndrome during long-term treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2005
Same journal

Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

The principle "Do No Harm" has two main versions, reflecting distinct ethical traditions. This study analyzes these versions and their contemporary applications in medical ethics and education.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • The principle of "Do No Harm" is a cornerstone of medical ethics.
  • Its interpretation and application have evolved throughout history.
  • Contemporary medical practice necessitates a clear understanding of its ethical underpinnings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To distinguish between two primary versions of the "Do No Harm" principle.
  • To connect these versions to established ethical traditions.
  • To demonstrate the significance of one version using contemporary ethical theory and suggest applications.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of ethical principles.
  • Relating principle variations to historical ethical traditions.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of contemporary ethical theory for analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Two distinct varieties of the "Do No Harm" principle were identified.
    • These varieties align with two major ethical traditions.
    • One version was shown to hold greater significance through modern ethical analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the nuances of "Do No Harm" is crucial for medical ethics.
    • The study highlights the importance of a specific interpretation for modern medical practice.
    • Recommendations are provided for integrating this understanding into medical ethics and education.