Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture
Johanne Koba Risager1, Niels Uldbjerg1, Julie Glavind1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Introduction:
Whether there is an association between residual myometrial thickness (RMT) after cesarean section (CS) and the risk of uterine rupture (UR) or uterine scar dehiscence at the subsequent delivery has been sparsely investigated.
Materials And Methods:
Our cohort included 149 women with a first CS in whom we measured RMT by transvaginal ultrasonography 6-15 months after their delivery. We did a follow-up study on delivery outcomes in the women's subsequent births. The exposure was scar measurements in the non-pregnant uterus, and the primary outcome was a diagnosis of UR or dehiscence. We calculated likelihood ratios (LRs) with 95% confidence intervals of having UR or dehiscence with a thin RMT (<3 mm).
Results:
Among the 149 women, 39 had a repeat CS (14 scheduled and 25 unscheduled procedures), and within these, we found one woman with UR and five women with uterine dehiscence. The proportion of women with a thin RMT was significantly higher among cases (4/6) than in controls (4/33); the LR was 5.5 (95% CI 1.9-16.2).
Conclusions:
The results suggest a significant association between a thin RMT as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in the non-pregnant uterus after a first scheduled CS and the risk of UR or dehiscence at a subsequent delivery.
