Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.5K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.5K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

33.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.8K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

23.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
23.0K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

43.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.7K
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

339
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
339
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

42.7K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
42.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AlertGS: determining alerts for gene sets.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Statistical analysis of high-dimensional biomedical data: a gentle introduction to analytical goals, common approaches and challenges.

BMC medicine·2023
Same author

High Accuracy Classification of Developmental Toxicants by In Vitro Tests of Human Neuroepithelial and Cardiomyoblast Differentiation.

Cells·2022
Same author

Model selection characteristics when using MCP-Mod for dose-response gene expression data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2022
Same author

Author Correction: Regenerative medicine and injection therapies in stress urinary incontinence.

Nature reviews. Urology·2020
Same author

Corrigendum to 'EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees' [European Urology 77 (2020) 223-250].

European urology·2020
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking DNA barcode decoding strategies under high error rates.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K

Cost-Constrained feature selection in binary classification: adaptations for greedy forward selection and genetic

Rudolf Jagdhuber1,2, Michel Lang1, Arnulf Stenzl3

  • 1Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.

BMC Bioinformatics
|January 30, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Feature selection methods were adapted to control biomarker costs, outperforming baseline alternatives in simulations with budget constraints. These adapted algorithms are crucial for selecting cost-effective biomarkers in medical applications.

Keywords:
Budget constraintCost limitFeature costFeature selectionGenetic algorithm

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.8K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Statistical analysis
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Biotechnology advances present complex statistical challenges in biomarker discovery from high-dimensional data.
  • Feature selection is vital for managing numerous biomarker candidates in biomedical data analysis.
  • Biomarker candidate costs, financial or otherwise, are an important but under-researched consideration in medical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend existing feature selection methods (greedy forward selection, genetic algorithms) to incorporate cost constraints.
  • To evaluate the performance of these adapted methods against baseline alternatives under budget limitations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of modified greedy forward selection and genetic algorithms to control feature costs.
  • Simulation studies involving binary classification tasks to compare methods.
  • Assessment of predictive performance, run-time, and relevant feature detection rates.

Main Results:

  • Proposed cost-aware feature selection methods outperformed baseline alternatives under predefined budget constraints.
  • A slight performance drop was observed in the adapted greedy forward selection without a budget constraint, which can be mitigated by a hyperparameter adjustment.
  • Minor differences in performance were noted between the proposed methods themselves.

Conclusions:

  • Standard feature selection algorithms are often inadequate for identifying optimal biomarker subsets when cost budgets are imposed.
  • Adaptations to feature selection algorithms, as proposed, are effective in addressing feature cost scenarios and budget constraints in biomarker selection.