Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
Dawn R Weatherford1,2, William Blake Erickson3, Jasmyne Thomas3
1Texas A&M University, San Antonio, TX, USA. Dawn.Weatherford@tamusa.edu.
Abstract:
In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person's ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced criterion shifting, thought to be one of the sources of the low-prevalence effect (LPE). Participants made identity judgments of a target face and an ID under either high, medium, or low mismatch prevalence. Feedback appeared after every trial, only error trials, or no trials. Experiment 1 used two controlled images taken on the same day. Experiment 2 used two controlled images taken at least 6 months apart. Experiment 3 used one controlled and one ambient image taken at least 1 year apart. Importantly, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that feedback and greater within-person variability exacerbated the LPE by affecting both criterion and discriminability. These results carry implications for many real-world settings, such as border crossings and airports, where identity screening plays a major role in securing public safety.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Deindividuation
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Prosopagnosia
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...

