Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions
Katie Biggs1, Daniel Hind2, Rebecca Gossage-Worrall2
1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. c.e.biggs@sheffield.ac.uk.
Evaluating group interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) presents unique challenges. This study highlights common issues in recruitment, attrition, and group size, offering practical insights for future trial design.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Group Dynamics in Healthcare
Background:
- Group interventions are widely used in healthcare for various purposes, including mental health recovery, behavior change, and health education.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating group interventions face practical challenges distinct from individual-level interventions.
- These challenges can impact trial design, implementation, and the interpretation of results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and summarize practical challenges encountered in the design and implementation of group intervention randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- To provide an empirical basis for planning future group intervention trials by analyzing recruitment, attrition, attendance, group size, and fidelity.
- To offer insights for trialists navigating the complexities of group-based research.
Main Methods:
- A case-based approach was used, summarizing the experience of the Sheffield Trials Unit in five group intervention RCTs.
- Key aspects reviewed included participant and facilitator recruitment and attrition, group session attendance, group size, and intervention fidelity.
- Data were analyzed to identify common patterns and challenges across the included trials.
Main Results:
- Recruitment rates varied, with a median of 3.2 participants per site per month, often involving delays to form groups.
- Facilitator attrition was common, particularly when facilitators were not directly employed by the grant holder, impacting trial continuity.
- Despite targets, a median of 76.7% of participants received a 'therapeutic dose' of the intervention, and 75.3% of sessions occurred outside the ideal group size.
Conclusions:
- This study provides the first empirical evidence to guide the planning of group intervention trials.
- Investigators must anticipate recruitment delays, group size issues, and both participant and facilitator attrition.
- Careful consideration of how attendance and group size influence treatment fidelity is crucial for successful group intervention RCTs.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Group Design
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Blinding

