Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Aspirating Patients
Maireade E McSweeney1, Patricia Meleedy-Rey2, Jessica Kerr2
1Aerodigestive Center and Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, maireade.mcsweeney@childrens.harvard.edu.
Insights
An evidence-based guideline (EBG) successfully reduced gastrostomy tube placement by 50% in infants and children with oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration. This approach standardized care without increasing hospital readmissions or emergency department visits.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Clinical Quality Improvement
- Swallowing Disorders
Background:
- Oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration are common in pediatric patients, leading to varied clinical practices for feeding tube management.
- Current approaches to oral feeding versus gastrostomy tube placement in children with dysphagia show significant practice variation.
- Standardizing care for pediatric dysphagia is crucial to optimize patient outcomes and resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement an evidence-based guideline (EBG) to standardize the management of pediatric oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration.
- To reduce the rate of gastrostomy tube placement in children diagnosed with aspiration.
- To evaluate the impact of the EBG on oral feeding rates and long-term patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A quality improvement intervention was implemented between January 2014 and December 2018, focusing on patients ≤2 years with respiratory symptoms and aspiration on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS).
- An EBG was developed and utilized by gastroenterologists to guide clinical decision-making for feeding interventions.
- The primary outcome was a 10% decrease in gastrostomy tube placement within 1 year of EBG initiation, with balancing measures including hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits.
Main Results:
- A total of 1668 patients with aspiration or penetration on VFSS were included in the analysis.
- Mean gastrostomy tube placement decreased from 10.9% at baseline to 5.2% within 1 year of EBG implementation, a 50% reduction.
- This reduction was sustained over 3 years, with no significant changes observed in hospital readmissions or ED visits.
Conclusions:
- Implementation of an evidence-based guideline significantly reduced gastrostomy tube placement in pediatric patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration.
- The standardized approach improved care without adversely affecting patient safety, as indicated by stable readmission and ED visit rates.
- This study demonstrates the effectiveness of an EBG in optimizing feeding strategies and reducing invasive interventions for children with swallowing difficulties.
Objectives:
Oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration may occur in infants and children. Currently, there is wide practice variation regarding when to feed children orally or place more permanent gastrostomy tube placement. Through implementation of an evidence-based guideline (EBG), we aimed to standardize the approach to these patients and reduce the rates of gastrostomy tube placement.
Methods:
Between January 2014 and December 2018, we designed and implemented a quality improvement intervention creating an EBG to be used by gastroenterologists evaluating patients ≤2 years of age with respiratory symptoms who were found to aspirate on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS). Our primary aim was to encourage oral feeding and decrease the use of gastrostomy tube placement by 10% within 1 year of EBG initiation; balancing measures included total hospital readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits within 6 months of the abnormal VFSS.
Results:
A total of 1668 patients (27.2%) were found to have aspiration or penetration noted on an initial VFSS during our initiative. Mean gastrostomy tube placement in these patients was 10.9% at the start of our EBG implementation and fell to 5.2% approximately 1 year after EBG initiation; this improvement was sustained throughout the next 3 years. Our balancing measures of ED visits and hospital readmissions also did not change during this time period.
Conclusions:
Through implementation of this EBG, we reduced gastrostomy tube placement by 50% in patients presenting with oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration, without increasing subsequent hospital admissions or ED visits.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:

