Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

08:16
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
13.7K
Errors and Action Monitoring: Errare Humanum Est Sed Corrigere Possibile
Franck Vidal1, Boris Burle1, Thierry Hasbroucq1
1Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, LNC UMR 7291, Marseille, France.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|January 31, 2020
Summary
Human information processing is prone to errors, but the brain has built-in mechanisms to prevent, detect, and correct mistakes, even before they happen, enhancing safety.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Factors Engineering
Background:
- Human information processing is inherently fallible, as recognized by Seneca's "errare humanum est."
- Recent research highlights specific psychophysiological mechanisms for managing errors in sensorimotor processing under time pressure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence on the brain's error management mechanisms.
- To emphasize the role of these mechanisms in everyday cognitive tasks.
- To inform the design of safer work systems resilient to human error.
Main Methods:
- Review of datasets from laboratory experiments.
- Analysis of sensorimotor information processing under time constraints.
- Examination of error prevention, detection, inhibition, and correction strategies.
Main Results:
- The human brain actively detects and corrects errors as they occur.
- Mechanisms exist to detect, inhibit, and correct errors before they fully manifest.
- These error management systems are crucial for cognitive performance.
Conclusions:
- Psychophysiological mechanisms play a vital role in mitigating human error.
- Understanding these mechanisms can lead to more resilient and safer work systems.
- Integrating knowledge of error processing enhances overall system safety.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
9.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.3K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
1.3K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Several factors...
1.3K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.2K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
535
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
535
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
8.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.3K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
104
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
104

