Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Cost-Utility of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Treatment of Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux
Nader Shaikh1,2, Vinod Rajakumar1, Caitlin G Peterson3
1Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Insights
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is cost-effective only for Grade IV cases. Prophylaxis for lower grades of VUR is not economically reasonable, despite reducing urinary tract infection (UTI) recurrences.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Health Economics
- Infectious Disease Management
Background:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children often necessitates long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs).
- The cost-effectiveness of this strategy, particularly in relation to VUR grade, requires detailed economic evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing different antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies for pediatric VUR.
- To determine if the benefits of prophylaxis outweigh risks and if effectiveness varies by VUR grade.
Main Methods:
- A cost-utility model evaluated four strategies for children under 6 with VUR post-first UTI.
- Strategies included prophylaxis for all grades, Grade III/IV, Grade IV only, or no prophylaxis.
- Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated over a lifetime, using a $100,000/QALY threshold.
Main Results:
- Prophylaxis for Grade IV VUR yielded a cost of $37,903 per QALY gained.
- Adding prophylaxis for Grade III/IV VUR increased costs by $302,024 per QALY.
- Prophylaxis for all VUR grades incurred an additional $339,740 per QALY.
Conclusions:
- Long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis for pediatric VUR Grades I-III is not cost-effective.
- Antimicrobial prophylaxis for pediatric Grade IV VUR is a cost-effective intervention.
Abstract:
Objective: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) reduces recurrences of urinary tract infection (UTI) but requires daily antimicrobials for extended periods. We used a cost-utility model to evaluate whether the benefits of antimicrobial prophylaxis outweigh its risks and, if so, to investigate whether the benefits and risks vary according to grade of VUR. Methods: We compared the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in four treatment strategies in children aged <6 years diagnosed with VUR after a first UTI, considering these treatment strategies: (1) prophylaxis for all children with VUR, (2) prophylaxis for children with Grade III or Grade IV VUR, (3) prophylaxis for children with Grade IV VUR, and (4) no prophylaxis. Costs and effectiveness were estimated over the patient's lifetime. We used $100,000/QALY gained as the threshold for considering a treatment strategy cost effective. Results: Based on current data and plausible ranges to account for data uncertainty, prophylaxis of children with Grades IV VUR costs $37,903 per QALY gained. Treating children with Grade III and IV VUR costs an additional $302,024 per QALY gained. Treating children with all grades of VUR costs an additional $339,740 per QALY gained. Conclusions: Treating children with Grades I, II, and III VUR with long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis costs substantially more than interventions typically considered economically reasonable. Prophylaxis in children with Grade IV VUR is cost effective.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

