Quantitative Evaluation of Articular Involvement of Posterior Malleolus Associated with Operative Indication: A...

The aim of this study was to compare the values of six methods in measuring the involvement of posterior malleolus and to demonstrate the reliability and reproducibility of each method. Three independent orthopaedic surgeons, retrospectively, measured 106 cases. The difference between the six methods was analyzed using Bonferroni-corrected paired t-tests after one-way ANOVA. The agreement between the six methods was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability. Significant differences were observed between values of any two of the six measurement methods (P < 0.0033), except between any two of the plane radiograph linear, axial CT linear, sagittal CT linear, and 3D CT linear. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated poor agreement between values of any two of the six methods. The lowest intraobserver reproducibility was 0.46 (moderate) for resident surgeon using plain radiographs. The intraobserver reproducibility for three surgeons using two-dimensional (2D) and 3D images was almost perfect (ICC, 0.82-0.96). The lowest interobserver reliability was 0.41 (moderate) between chief and attending surgeon using plain radiographs, and it improved to almost perfect (ICC, 0.81-0.95) with the use of 3D CT images. The standard error of measurement showed almost the same results as ICC values. The existing operative indications which were determined based on plain radiography are neither reliable nor suitable for other measurement methods. Both 3D linear and 3D surface measurement methods are reliable and reproducible in measuring posterior fragment involvement, and experience is not so crucial. Operative indications for posterior malleolar fractures need to be redefined based on the 3D measurement method.