Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Association of diabetes with outcomes in patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention:
Ply Chichareon1, Rodrigo Modolo2, Norihiro Kogame3
1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cardiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Insights
Diabetic patients face higher ischemic event risks after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, bleeding risks remain comparable, and outcomes are unaffected by different antiplatelet strategies in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetes Mellitus
Background:
- Diabetes is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Conflicting data exists regarding diabetic patient outcomes in the era of drug-eluting stents and potent P2Y12 inhibitors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate ischemic and bleeding outcomes in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients after contemporary PCI.
- To assess the impact of different antiplatelet strategies on these outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 15,957 patients from the GLOBAL LEADERS study undergoing PCI.
- Primary endpoint: all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years.
- Secondary safety endpoint: major bleeding (BARC type 3 or 5).
Main Results:
- Diabetic patients (25% of cohort) had a significantly higher risk of the primary endpoint at 2 years (aHR 1.38).
- Increased mortality risk was the main driver in diabetics (aHR 1.47).
- Bleeding risk (BARC 3 or 5) was comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic groups (aHR 1.09).
Conclusions:
- Diabetic patients exhibit an elevated risk of ischemic events post-PCI, but not increased bleeding risk.
- The antiplatelet strategy did not significantly alter PCI outcomes for diabetic or non-diabetic patients.
Background And Aims:
Diabetes has been well recognized as a strong predictor for adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), however, studies in the era of drug-eluting stent and potent P2Y12 inhibitors have shown conflicting results. We aimed to assess ischemic and bleeding outcomes after contemporary PCI according to diabetic status.
Methods:
We studied 15,957 patients undergoing PCI for stable or acute coronary syndrome in the GLOBAL LEADERS study with known baseline diabetic status. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years. The secondary safety endpoint was major bleeding defined as bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5.
Results:
A quarter of the study cohort were diabetic (4038/15,957), and these patients had a significantly higher risk of primary endpoint at 2 years compared to non-diabetics (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.63). The difference was driven by a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality at 2 years in diabetics (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22-1.78). The risk of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding was comparable between the two groups (adjusted HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.86-1.39). The antiplatelet strategy (experimental versus reference strategy) had no significant effect on the rates of primary endpoint and secondary safety endpoint at 2 years in patients with and without diabetes.
Conclusions:
Diabetic patients had higher risk of ischemic events after PCI than non-diabetic patients, whilst bleeding risk was comparable. The outcomes of diabetic patients following PCI were not affected by the two different antiplatelet strategies.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care