Reduced Exercise Capacity in Diabetes Mellitus Is Not Associated with Impaired Deformation or Twist

Exercise capacity is frequently reduced in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and may be due to subclinical cardiac dysfunction. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is now widely available; however, the clinical utility and significance of left ventricular (LV) strain and twist parameters remain uncertain. We hypothesized that LV strain and twist would be reduced in DM subjects during exercise.

Adults with type 1 or type 2 DM and age- and sex-matched controls performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (VO₂ peak) and supine bicycle exercise echocardiography. Detailed echocardiographic assessment of biventricular function was performed at baseline and repeated during incremental exercise to maximal intensity.

Of the 60 participants completing the study protocol, 51 (34 DM, 17 controls; mean age, 42 ± 13 years; 69% male; DM duration, 16 ± 10 years) had sufficient image quality to assess LV deformation and twist mechanics at rest. Of these, 38 (25 DM, 13 controls) were able to be assessed immediately after exercise. Baseline LV systolic and diastolic function using standard echocardiography measurements were similar between groups. Resting LV global longitudinal strain, twist, twist rate and untwist rate, and the corresponding peak exercise and reserve measures did not differ significantly. As compared with the control subjects, exercise capacity was reduced in the DM cohort (VO₂ peak 33 ± 10 vs 41 ± 12 mL/minute/kg; P = .02); however, no correlation was observed between VO₂ peak and LV twist reserve (R = 0.28, P = .09), LV twist rate reserve (R = 0.14, P = .39), or LV untwist rate reserve (R = 0.24, P = .14).

Despite reduced VO₂ peak, LV twist mechanics at rest and after maximal intensity exercise did not differ significantly in a cohort of asymptomatic DM subjects with normal resting LV systolic and diastolic function compared with age- and sex-matched controls. This would suggest that exercise capacity can be reduced in the absence of subclinical cardiac dysfunction and that noncardiac factors should be considered as alternative explanations.