Epicardial Pacemaker in Neonates and Infants: Is There a Relationship Between Patient Size, Device Size, and Wound

Servet Ergün1, Hasan Candaş Kafalı2, Serhat Bahadır Genç3

  • 1Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Education and Research Hospital, İstasyon Mahallesi İstanbul Caddesi Bezirganbahçe Mevki, 34303, Istanbul, Turkey. drservetergun41@gmail.com.

Pediatric Cardiology
|February 3, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Epicardial pacemaker implantation in infants showed a low complication rate (9%). Device type and patient size did not significantly impact outcomes, supporting dual-chamber pacemaker use for AV synchronization.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Epicardial pacemaker (PM) implantation is a critical intervention for neonates and infants with cardiac conditions.
  • Understanding PM-related complications is essential for optimizing patient care and device selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate complications following epicardial pacemaker implantation in infants.
  • To analyze the relationship between patient size, device characteristics, and complication development.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective evaluation of 55 infants (<1 year) who underwent epicardial PM placement (May 2010 - July 2018).
  • Complications defined as rehospitalization-requiring events (e.g., wound issues, infection, device revision).
  • Patients categorized by weight (<3 kg, 3-5 kg, >5 kg); single- vs. dual-chamber devices compared.

Main Results:

  • Nine percent (5/55) of patients experienced 18 PM-related complications.
  • No statistically significant difference in complication rates was found across weight groups (p>0.05).
  • Single-chamber vs. dual-chamber device implantation did not significantly affect complication development (p>0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Epicardial PM implantation in infants has a low complication incidence.
  • Patient size and device type (single vs. dual chamber) did not significantly influence complication rates.
  • Findings support the use of dual-chamber pacemakers for improved atrioventricular synchronization in pediatric cardiac conditions.

Related Concept Videos