A Retrospective Analysis of Intervention for Testicular Torsion: Searching for a Hallmark of High Reliability

Consistent delivery of high-quality care is a marker of health-care system reliability. Although clinically abstracted outcome databases have revolutionized surgical quality improvement efforts for many high-volume procedures, their utility in aiding the improvement of time-sensitive processes is less clear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether process measures surrounding the delivery of timely surgical care could delineate the variability in the outcome of patients with testicular torsion. Our secondary aim was to use the data to drive quality improvement efforts locally.

We performed a retrospective review of encounters for testicular torsion in patients less than 18 years. Characteristics of patients undergoing detorsion/orchiopexy and orchiectomy were compared. We evaluated orchiectomy as a function of age, insurance status, time of presentation, duration of symptoms, time to ultrasound, and time to surgery.

Over 10 years, we identified 46 patients, of whom 21 met inclusion criteria. Twelve patients (57.1%) underwent detorsion/orchiopexy, whereas 9 patients underwent orchiectomy. After-hours presentation and age were not predictive of orchiectomy, whereas the duration of symptoms was predictive of orchiectomy. Differences in time to surgery for orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups approached but did not reach significance (P = 0.07).

Significant variability persists in the timely delivery of comprehensive and coordinated care for children suffering from time-sensitive surgical conditions. Pediatric surgical programs would realize significant benefit from a surgical quality improvement program that incorporates validated process metrics, along with outcome measures, to help drive efficiencies and integrate care more effectively.