Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of the Arabic Dementia Diagnosis Attitude Scale (A-DDAS).

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

The MenoStim Trial: Study Protocol for a Randomised, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Pilot Clinical Trial Exploring the Neurophysiological, Cognitive, Mood and Biochemical Effects Associated with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation During the Menopause Transition.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

The Effect of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation on Cognitive Function in Cognitively Healthy Adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Pilot Study.

Methods and protocols·2025
Same author

"It Became More and More Important to Bring the World Into the House": Exploring the Barriers and Facilitators to a Culturally Inclusive Dementia-Friendly Community.

Dementia (London, England)·2025
Same author

Validation of a dementia diagnosis attitude scale in simplified Chinese with Mandarin-speaking adults in Australia.

Australasian journal on ageing·2025
Same author

Prestimulus EEG Oscillations and Pink Noise Affect Go/No-Go ERPs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.5K

Auditory stimulus- and response-locked ERP components and behavior.

Jack S Fogarty1, Robert J Barry1, Genevieve Z Steiner1,2,3

  • 1Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Psychophysiology
|February 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies auditory event-related potential (ERP) components by analyzing stimulus- and response-locked data. Key components like P3b, SW1, and SW2 are primarily response-related, aiding in understanding cognitive control.

Keywords:
ERPsauditory processesbehaviorcognitive controlinformation processing

More Related Videos

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

12.5K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.5K
Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

12.5K
How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) are crucial for understanding neural processing.
  • Distinguishing stimulus- and response-related ERP components is vital for functional interpretation.
  • Auditory Go/NoGo tasks provide a framework for examining cognitive control mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the functional significance of Go event-related potential (ERP) components.
  • To investigate the effects of stimulus- and response-locked averaging on ERP components.
  • To differentiate between stimulus-specific, response-specific, and common ERP components.

Main Methods:

  • 126 healthy young adults participated in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
  • Temporal principal components analysis (PCA) decomposed stimulus- and response-locked ERP data.
  • MANOVAs and stepwise linear regressions analyzed component amplitudes and their relation to reaction time and errors.

Main Results:

  • Nine ERP components were identified: N1-1, processing negativity (PN), P2, response-related N2 (RN2), motor potential (MP), P3b, P420, SW1, and SW2.
  • N1-1, PN, and P2 were stimulus-specific; RN2, MP, and P420 were response-specific.
  • P3b, SW1, and SW2 were common components, significantly larger in response-locked data, indicating primary response-related function.

Conclusions:

  • The study successfully differentiated stimulus- and response-related ERP components.
  • Common components P3b, SW1, and SW2 are primarily driven by response processes.
  • These findings offer insights into ERP markers for auditory processing, cognitive control, and reaction time prediction.