Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Exploring Reimbursement Options for the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Lessons Learned From a Pilot Project in
Jennifer Torres Mosst1, Amelia DeFosset, Megala Sivashanmugam
1Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California (Drs Mosst and Kuo and Mss DeFosset and Sivashanmugam); Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California (Dr Kuo); Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California (Dr Kuo); and Population Health Program, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Los Angeles, California (Dr Kuo).
Context:
Although Medicare and several state Medicaid programs are beginning to cover the cost of delivering the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP), little is known about the logistical challenges to establishing reimbursement options for these services.
Objective:
To describe Los Angeles' experience working with payers to identify and establish reimbursement pathways for National DPP providers.
Design:
A case study was conducted to identify regional options for covering the costs of the National DPP.
Setting:
Los Angeles.
Participants:
A managed care organization along with selected National DPP providers (those that provide in-person and/or online services) participated in this regional pilot project.
Intervention:
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health explored and prototyped reimbursement options for the National DPP, using input from and participation by target health plans (payers) and program providers.
Main Outcome Measure:
The establishment of a regional reimbursement approach for the National DPP.
Results:
Pilot project participants weighed the pros and cons of billing (Medicare/Medicaid)/reimbursing for program services directly, ultimately choosing to go with a third-party integrator that worked with payers to handle the administrative process of reimbursing program providers for their services. The integrator negotiated and obtained reimbursements on the behalf of the National DPP providers.
Conclusions:
Lessons from this case study suggest an emerging need to build further capacity among National DPP providers, as they are often community-based organizations that are not equipped to bill Medicare/Medicaid directly for services. A third-party integrator represents a viable approach for addressing this logistical issue.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Preventive Healthcare Services

