Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

09:17
Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores
Published on: March 26, 2019
13.1K
Differentiation during fig ontogeny suggests opposing selection by mutualists
Silvia B Lomáscolo1, Douglas J Levey2
1Instituto de Ecología Regional CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán Residencia Universitaria Horco Molle Yerba Buena Argentina.
Ecology and Evolution
|February 5, 2020
Summary
Dioecious figs have distinct male and female syconia that attract pollinators, with seed figs later attracting seed dispersers. Monoecious figs, like seed figs, attract both, showing divergent evolution in fig-plant interactions.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Botany
Background:
- Dioecious figs separate male and female functions, influencing co-evolution with pollinators and seed dispersers.
- Monoecious figs and dioecious figs (male/gall and female/seed) face different selective pressures regarding pollinators and seed dispersers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if dioecious fig syconia (gall vs. seed) and monoecious syconia differ in characteristics at different developmental stages.
- To investigate how these differences relate to attracting pollinators and seed dispersers.
Main Methods:
- Quantified syconium characteristics across 24 dioecious and 11 monoecious fig species.
- Recorded visits by frugivores to different syconium types.
Main Results:
- Seed and gall syconia are similar at the flower stage but diverge by the fruit stage.
- Monoecious syconia resemble seed syconia more than gall syconia.
- Frugivore visitation rates were higher for monoecious and seed syconia compared to gall syconia.
Conclusions:
- Syconium similarity at the flower stage likely optimizes pollination for both gall and seed figs.
- Differentiation during fruit development enhances seed dispersal for figs with viable seeds.
- Ontogenetic differences highlight divergent evolutionary responses to ecological pressures from pollinators and dispersers.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
43.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.7K
Frequency-dependent Selection
23.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
23.0K
Limits to Natural Selection
33.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.8K
What is Natural Selection?
125.3K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
125.3K
Competition
24.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
24.2K
Optimal Foraging
13.3K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.3K

