Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

386
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
386
What is Variation?01:14

What is Variation?

17.4K
Apart from the measures of central tendency, distribution, outliers, and the changing characteristics of data with time, an important characteristic of any data set is its variation or spread. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in others, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean.
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
17.4K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

507
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
507
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.8K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

13.9K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
13.9K
Quartile01:15

Quartile

8.5K
Quartiles are numbers that separate the data into quarters. Quartiles may or may not be part of the data. To find the quartiles, first, find the median or second quartile. The first quartile, Q1, is the middle value of the lower half of the data, and the third quartile, Q3, is the middle value, or median, of the upper half of the data. To get the idea, consider the same data set:
1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 6; 6.8; 7.2; 8; 8.3; 9; 10; 10; 11.5
The median or second quartile is seven. The lower half of the...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PON-Del predictor for sequence retaining protein deletions.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Proteome-Wide Analysis of Human Deletions.

Proteins·2025
Same author

ProToxin, a Predictor of Protein Toxicity.

Toxins·2025
Same author

Sequence-Based Prediction for Protein Solvent Accessibility.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

BTKbase, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Variant Database in X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia: Looking Back and Ahead.

Human mutation·2025
Same author

PON-P3: Accurate Prediction of Pathogenicity of Amino Acid Substitutions.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K

Variation benchmark datasets: update, criteria, quality and applications.

Anasua Sarkar1, Yang Yang2,3, Mauno Vihinen1

  • 1Department of Experimental Medical Science, BMC B13, Lund University, SE-22 184 Lund, Sweden.

Database : the Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
|February 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary

High-quality benchmark datasets are crucial for developing and validating computational methods for genetic variation interpretation. The updated VariBench database provides a comprehensive resource for researchers, facilitating method development and performance comparison.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

937

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

937

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Developing and testing computational methods requires experimental data for performance assessment.
  • Benchmark datasets with verified outcomes are essential for evaluating new algorithms.
  • Existing databases like VariBench and VariSNP facilitate sharing of variation benchmark datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To update and expand the VariBench database with new datasets.
  • To facilitate the development and benchmarking of computational methods for genetic variation analysis.
  • To enable comparison of new method performances against existing studies.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporation of 419 new datasets from 109 papers into VariBench.
  • Categorization of datasets into 20 groups based on variant type and effect.
  • Description of variants at DNA, RNA, and protein levels, including structural information.

Main Results:

  • The updated VariBench contains over 329 million variants, reducing redundancy.
  • Datasets cover diverse variation types, including insertions, deletions, substitutions, and effects on DNA, RNA, and protein properties.
  • Performance comparison of the PON-P2 predictor demonstrated the utility of benchmark studies.

Conclusions:

  • The updated VariBench database enhances the development and testing of new computational methods for variation interpretation.
  • Facilitates standardized performance comparison of prediction tools.
  • Highlights the need for detailed information and data sharing to overcome limitations in comparative studies.