Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology following the Evolution...

Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympatric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the innovation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing selection on body size (dragons). Despite this constraining effect in dragons, sympatric gliders exhibit greater size disparity compared with allopatric gliders, a pattern consistent with, although not exclusively explained by, ecological competition changing the adaptive landscape of body size evolution to induce character displacement. These results show that innovations do not necessarily instigate further differentiation among species, as is so often assumed, and suggest that competition can be a powerful force generating morphological divergence among coexisting species, even in the face of strong stabilizing selection.