Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan in cancer patients with heart failure
Ana Martín-Garcia1,2, Teresa López-Fernández2,3, Cristina Mitroi4
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca-IBSAL, University of Salamanca, Paseo de San Vicente 58-187, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan shows promise for treating cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), improving heart function and symptoms. This study found the drug well-tolerated in CTRCD patients, suggesting a potential new treatment avenue.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
- Evidence for sacubitril/valsartan in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is limited.
- CTRCD poses a significant challenge in cancer survivorship and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with CTRCD.
- To analyze the potential benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in improving cardiac function and symptoms in CTRCD patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective multicenter registry study (HF-COH) was conducted across six Spanish hospitals.
- Data from 67 patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan for CTRCD were collected, including demographics, clinical characteristics, and echocardiographic data.
- Median follow-up was 4.6 months.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril/valsartan treatment led to significant improvements in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, NYHA functional class, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Improvements were observed regardless of the sacubitril/valsartan dosage achieved.
- The drug was well-tolerated, with only 6% of patients discontinuing treatment; no significant changes in creatinine or potassium levels were noted.
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril/valsartan is well-tolerated in patients with CTRCD.
- The drug demonstrates significant improvements in echocardiographic parameters, biomarker levels, and symptomatic status in this patient population.
- Sacubitril/valsartan represents a potential therapeutic option for managing CTRCD.
Aims:
Current guidelines recommend sacubitril/valsartan for patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but there is lack of evidence of its efficacy and safety in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Our aim was to analyse the potential benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with CTRCD.
Methods And Results:
We performed a retrospective multicentre registry (HF-COH) in six Spanish hospitals with cardio-oncology clinics including all patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan. Demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory and echocardiographic data were collected. Median follow-up was 4.6 [1; 11] months. Sixty-seven patients were included (median age was 63 ± 14 years; 64% were female, 87% had at least one cardiovascular risk factor). Median time from anti-cancer therapy to CTRD was 41 [10; 141] months. Breast cancer (45%) and lymphoma (39%) were the most frequent neoplasm, 31% had metastatic disease, and all patients were treated with combination antitumor therapy (70% with anthracyclines). Thirty-nine per cent of patients had received thoracic radiotherapy. Baseline median LVEF was 33 [27; 37], and 21% had atrial fibrillation. Eighty-five per cent were on beta-blocker therapy and 76% on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; 90% of the patients were symptomatic NYHA functional class ≥II. Maximal sacubitril/valsartan titration dose was achieved in 8% of patients (50 mg b.i.d.: 60%; 100 mg b.i.d.: 32%). Sacubitril/valsartan was discontinued in four patients (6%). Baseline N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (1552 pg/mL [692; 3624] vs. 776 [339; 1458]), functional class (2.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.6 ± 0.6), and LVEF (33% [27; 37] vs. 42 [35; 50]) improved at the end of follow-up (all P values ≤0.01). No significant statistical differences were found in creatinine (0.9 mg/dL [0.7; 1.1] vs. 0.9 [0.7; 1.1]; P = 0.055) or potassium serum levels (4.5 mg/dL [4.1; 4.8] vs. 4.5 [4.2; 4.8]; P = 0.5). Clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical improvements were found regardless of the achieved sacubitril-valsartan dose (low or medium/high doses).
Conclusions:
Our experience suggests that sacubitril/valsartan is well tolerated and improves echocardiographic functional and structural parameters, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and symptomatic status in patients with CTRCD.
More Related Videos
14:24Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
07:24Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers