Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma
Published on: September 3, 2021
Predicting Clinical Efficacy of Vascular Disrupting Agents in Rodent Models of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers:
Yewei Liu1,2, Shuncong Wang1, Xiaohui Zhao3
1KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract:
Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) have entered clinical trials for over 15 years. As the leading VDA, combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) has been evaluated in combination with chemotherapy and molecular targeting agents among patients with ovarian cancer, lung cancer and thyroid cancer, but still remains rarely explored in human liver cancers. To overcome tumor residues and regrowth after CA4P monotherapy, a novel dual targeting pan-anticancer theragnostic strategy, i.e., OncoCiDia, has been developed and shown promise previously in secondary liver tumor models. Animal model of primary liver cancer is time consuming to induce, but of value for more closely mimicking human liver cancers in terms of tumor angiogenesis, histopathological heterogeneity, cellular differentiation, tumor components, cancer progression and therapeutic response. Being increasingly adopted in VDA researches, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides imaging biomarkers to reflect in vivo tumor responses to drugs. In this article as a chapter of a doctoral thesis, we overview the construction and clinical relevance of primary and secondary liver cancer models in rodents. Target selection for CA4P therapy assisted by enhanced MRI using hepatobiliary contrast agents (CAs), and therapeutic efficacy evaluated by using MRI with a non-specific contrast agent, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) are also described. We then summarize diverse responses among primary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), secondary liver and pancreatic tumors to CA4P, which appeared to be related to tumor size, vascularity, and cellular differentiation. In general, imaging-histopathology correlation studies allow to conclude that CA4P tends to be more effective in secondary liver tumors and in more differentiated HCCs, but less effective in less differentiated HCCs and implanted pancreatic tumor. Notably, cirrhotic liver may be responsive to CA4P as well. All these could be instructive for future clinical trials of VDAs.
Insights
Combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) shows varied efficacy in liver cancer models, being more effective in secondary liver tumors and differentiated HCCs. Imaging-histopathology correlation guides future clinical trials for vascular disrupting agents.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) like combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) have potential in cancer therapy but are under-explored in liver cancers.
- Novel theragnostic strategies and advanced imaging techniques are crucial for overcoming treatment resistance and improving outcomes.
- Rodent models of primary and secondary liver cancer offer valuable insights into tumor biology and drug response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the construction and clinical relevance of primary and secondary liver cancer models in rodents.
- To explore the use of multiparametric MRI with contrast agents for target selection and efficacy evaluation of CA4P.
- To summarize the diverse responses of liver and pancreatic tumors to CA4P and identify factors influencing efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Overview of rodent models for primary and secondary liver cancer.
- Application of multiparametric MRI, including dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), for assessing tumor response.
- Correlation of imaging findings with histopathology to evaluate therapeutic efficacy of CA4P.
Main Results:
- CA4P demonstrated varied efficacy across different tumor types and differentiation states.
- CA4P was more effective in secondary liver tumors and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).
- Less differentiated HCCs and pancreatic tumors showed less response to CA4P; cirrhotic liver also showed potential responsiveness.
Conclusions:
- Imaging-histopathology correlation is vital for understanding CA4P's efficacy in liver cancer models.
- Tumor characteristics like size, vascularity, and differentiation significantly influence CA4P response.
- Findings provide guidance for future clinical trials of VDAs in liver cancer patients.

