Predicting Clinical Efficacy of Vascular Disrupting Agents in Rodent Models of Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers:

Yewei Liu1,2, Shuncong Wang1, Xiaohui Zhao3

  • 1KU Leuven, Biomedical Group, Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Insights

Combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) shows varied efficacy in liver cancer models, being more effective in secondary liver tumors and differentiated HCCs. Imaging-histopathology correlation guides future clinical trials for vascular disrupting agents.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) like combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) have potential in cancer therapy but are under-explored in liver cancers.
  • Novel theragnostic strategies and advanced imaging techniques are crucial for overcoming treatment resistance and improving outcomes.
  • Rodent models of primary and secondary liver cancer offer valuable insights into tumor biology and drug response.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the construction and clinical relevance of primary and secondary liver cancer models in rodents.
  • To explore the use of multiparametric MRI with contrast agents for target selection and efficacy evaluation of CA4P.
  • To summarize the diverse responses of liver and pancreatic tumors to CA4P and identify factors influencing efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of rodent models for primary and secondary liver cancer.
  • Application of multiparametric MRI, including dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), for assessing tumor response.
  • Correlation of imaging findings with histopathology to evaluate therapeutic efficacy of CA4P.

Main Results:

  • CA4P demonstrated varied efficacy across different tumor types and differentiation states.
  • CA4P was more effective in secondary liver tumors and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).
  • Less differentiated HCCs and pancreatic tumors showed less response to CA4P; cirrhotic liver also showed potential responsiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Imaging-histopathology correlation is vital for understanding CA4P's efficacy in liver cancer models.
  • Tumor characteristics like size, vascularity, and differentiation significantly influence CA4P response.
  • Findings provide guidance for future clinical trials of VDAs in liver cancer patients.

Related Concept Videos