Robustness of Serologic Investigations for Chikungunya and Mayaro Viruses following Coemergence

Carlo Fischer1, Fernando Bozza2, Xiomara Jeanleny Merino Merino3,4

  • 1Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humbolt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.

Msphere
|February 7, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Mayaro virus (MAYV) co-circulation causes false positives in antibody tests. Parallel ELISA testing for both viruses significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and differentiates infections effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Entomology
  • Virology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Mayaro virus (MAYV) are antigenically related alphaviruses co-circulating in Latin America.
  • Their antigenic relatedness poses challenges for accurate serologic diagnostics and epidemiologic surveillance due to potential antibody cross-reactivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate antibody cross-reactivity between CHIKV and MAYV in commonly used serologic tests.
  • To assess the diagnostic performance of individual versus parallel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and plaque reduction neutralization testing (PRNT) for differentiating CHIKV and MAYV infections.

Main Methods:

  • Testing of 64 CHIKV-specific and 37 MAYV-specific human sera from Peru and Brazil using commercially available ELISAs and PRNT.
  • Longitudinal analysis of CHIKV-specific sera to determine optimal timing for IgM and IgG testing.
  • Comparison of positive predictive values (PPV) for individual and parallel testing strategies.

Main Results:

  • Commercially available ELISAs showed approximately 50% false-positive results due to cross-reactivity.
  • Parallel ELISA testing significantly increased PPV for IgM (35.3% to 88.2%) and IgG (61.3% to 96.8%).
  • IgG cross-reactivity was asymmetric, higher in MAYV-specific sera (57.9%) than CHIKV-specific sera (29.5%). PRNT improved PPV but is labor-intensive.

Conclusions:

  • Individual CHIKV or MAYV testing is prone to misclassification, impacting patient diagnostics and surveillance.
  • Parallel ELISA testing offers an efficient and practical solution for differentiating CHIKV and MAYV infections.
  • This parallel testing approach can serve as a global template for managing co-emerging alphaviruses.