Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
Published on: January 19, 2018
Probing phase transition in VO2 with the novel observation of low-frequency collective spin excitation
Raktima Basu1, V Srihari2, Manas Sardar3
1Surface and Nanoscience Division, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kalpakkam, 603102, India. raktimabasu14@gmail.com.
Abstract:
VO2 is well known for its first order, reversible, metal-to-insulator transition (MIT) along with a simultaneous structural phase transition (SPT) from a high-temperature metallic rutile tetragonal (R) to an insulating low-temperature monoclinic (M1) phase via two other insulating metastable phases of monoclinic M2 and triclinic T. At the same time, VO2 gains tremendous attention because of the half-a-century-old controversy over its origin, whether electron-electron correlation or electron-phonon coupling trigger the phase transition. In this regard, V1-xMgxO2 samples were grown in stable phases of VO2 (M1, M2, and T) by controlled doping of Mg. We have observed a new collective mode in the low-frequency Raman spectra of all three insulating M1, M2 and T phases. We identify this mode with the breather (singlet spin excitation) mode about a spin-Pierls dimerized one dimensional spin ½ Heisenberg chain. The measured frequencies of these collective modes are phenomenologically consistent with the superexchange coupling strength between V spin ½ moments in all three phases. The significant deviation of Stokes to anti-Stokes intensity ratio of this low-frequency Raman mode from the usual thermal factor exp(hʋ/KBT) for phonons, and the orthogonal dependency of the phonon and spinon vibration in the polarized Raman study confirm its origin as spin excitations. The shift in the frequency of spin-wave and simultaneous increase in the transition temperature in the absence of any structural change confirms that SPT does not prompt MIT in VO2. On the other hand, the presence of spin-wave confirms the perturbation due to spin-Peierls dimerization leading to SPT. Thus, the observation of spin-excitations resulting from 1-D Heisenberg spin-½ chain can finally resolve the years-long debate in VO2 and can be extended to oxide-based multiferroics, which are useful for various potential device applications.
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...

