Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

443
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
443
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

31.6K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
31.6K
Ranks01:02

Ranks

416
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
416
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.8K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.8K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

3.4K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.4K
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

500
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
500

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facile and Green Fabrication of Porous Hydrogels Based on Gelatin Microsphere Porogens for 3D Immune Cell Culture.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

BN-NeRF: A fast 3D reconstruction and phenotyping framework for banana plants using handheld devices.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

SGO1 and SGO2 are Associated With Disease Progression and an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

A Novel Freshwater Anammox Species of <i>Candidatus</i> Loosdrechtia Thriving Under Dual Salinity and Sulfate Stresses.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

The impact of generative artificial intelligence on clinical skills and knowledge acquisition in medical undergraduates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Quantifying relative health impact across Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance's portfolio in 117 countries at the subregional level: a modelling study.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

STED: flexible cross-modal topic modeling infers cell-type-specific regulatory landscapes from bulk epigenomics.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A knowledge-guided deep learning framework for quantitative nucleic acid testing.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Optimal transport for label transfer in single-cell multi-omics integration.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating completeness, coherence, and consistency of genome-scale function annotations.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Transformers for single-cell RNA sequencing: a survey.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

High-dimensional variable selection for ordinal outcomes with error control.

Han Fu1, Kellie J Archer1

  • 1Ohio State University.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|February 8, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new variable importance measures for ordinal responses, comparing two frameworks: model-X knockoffs and reference distribution variable selection (RDVS). The methods were evaluated for controlling false discovery rate (FDR) and power in genomic data analysis.

Keywords:
L 1 penalizationboostingfalse discovery rateknockoff filterordinal forestsordinal regression

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Biostatistics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • High-throughput genomic studies often involve numerous covariates and ordinal responses, necessitating robust variable selection methods.
  • Controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) while maintaining statistical power is a critical challenge in identifying relevant variables.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel variable importance measures for ordinal responses within existing selection frameworks.
  • To compare the performance of model-X knockoffs and reference distribution variable selection (RDVS) in terms of FDR and power.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed importance measures for ordinal responses using penalized regression and machine learning techniques.
  • Integrated these measures into the model-X knockoffs and RDVS variable selection frameworks.
  • Evaluated performance using simulated data and applied to high-throughput methylation data.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the applicability of penalized regression and machine learning for creating importance measures suitable for ordinal responses.
  • Compared the FDR and power of the two frameworks across different scenarios.
  • Identified features associated with liver cancer progression using methylation data.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a comparative analysis of two variable selection frameworks for high-throughput genomic data with ordinal outcomes.
  • The developed methods offer valuable tools for identifying significant variables in complex biological datasets.
  • The findings have implications for understanding disease progression, such as from normal liver tissue to hepatocellular carcinoma.