Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Prognostic power of left atrial strain in patients with acute heart failure
Jae-Hyeong Park1, In-Chang Hwang2, Jin Joo Park2
1Department of Cardiology in Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, 35015 Daejeon, Korea.
Aims:
Left atrial (LA) dysfunction can be associated with left ventricular (LV) disorders; however, its clinical significance has not been well-studied in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We evaluated prognostic power of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) of the left atrium according to heart failure (HF) phenotypes and atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods And Results:
From an AHF registry with 4312 patients, we analysed PALS in 3818 patients. Patients were categorized into PALS tertiles. We also divided the patients according to HF phenotypes [HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), or HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] and presence of AF. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. PALS was weakly but significantly correlated with LA volume index (r = -0.310, P < 0.001), E/e' (r = -0.245, P < 0.001), and LV ejection fraction (r = 0.371, P < 0.001). A total of 2016 patients (52.8%) experienced adverse clinical events during median follow-up duration of 30.6 months (interquartile ranges 11.6-54.4 months). In the multivariate analysis, PALS was a significant predictor of events [hazard ratio (HR) 0.984, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.971-0.996; P = 0.012]. Patients with the lowest tertile (HR 1.576, 95% CI 1.219-2.038; P < 0.001) had a higher number of events than those with the highest tertile in the multivariate analysis. In the subgroup analysis, however, PALS was not a prognosticator (HR 0.987, 95% CI 0.974-1.000; P = 0.056) in AF patients. The prognostic power of PALS was not different between HFrEF (HR 0.977, 95% CI 0.969-0.974; P < 0.001), HFmrEF (HR 0.984, 95% CI 0.972-0.996; P = 0.008), and HFpEF (HR 0.980, 95% CI 0.973-0.987; P < 0.001, P for interaction = 0.433).
Conclusion:
PALS was a significant prognostic marker in AHF patients. The prognostic power was similar regardless of HF phenotypes, but PALS was not associated with clinical events in AF patients.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
07:28Donor Posterior Atrial Flap Rotation for Left Atrial Cuff Reconstruction in Lung Transplantation
Published on: October 11, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...