Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
The mixed model for repeated measures for cluster randomized trials: a simulation study investigating bias and type I
Melanie L Bell1, Brooke A Rabe2
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA. melaniebell@email.arizona.edu.
The mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) is suitable for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with longitudinal data, even with missing values. This statistical approach provides unbiased estimates and nominal Type I error rates, supporting its use in complex trial designs.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trials Methodology
Background:
- Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are essential for interventions where individual randomization is impractical.
- The mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) is widely used for longitudinal continuous outcomes in individually randomized trials.
- MMRM offers advantages in avoiding model misspecification and ensuring unbiasedness for missing data (missing completely at random or missing at random).
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) to cluster randomized trials (CRTs).
- To evaluate the statistical properties of the extended MMRM-CRT using simulation when data are missing at random.
- To demonstrate the MMRM-CRT with a real-world example of a cardiovascular disease prevention trial.
Main Methods:
- Extended MMRM by incorporating a random intercept for the cluster.
- Conducted a simulation experiment varying key parameters: number of clusters, cluster size, intra-cluster correlation, and missingness patterns.
- Simulated continuous outcomes at baseline and three post-intervention time points.
- Applied the MMRM-CRT to a cluster randomized trial in diabetes patients for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Main Results:
- Estimates of treatment effects were unbiased under both complete and missing-at-random data scenarios.
- Variance components demonstrated largely unbiased estimates.
- Type I error rates were generally nominal, with minor inflation (up to 0.081) in specific simulation cases.
Conclusions:
- The MMRM for CRTs is appropriate for longitudinal continuous outcomes, contrary to some assertions about its limitations with multiple repeated measures.
- The MMRM-CRT is a statistically sound and recommended analytic strategy for cluster randomized trials with longitudinal data.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Censoring Survival Data
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

