Accuracy of automated amygdala MRI segmentation approaches in Huntington's disease in the IMAGE-HD cohort

Bonnie Alexander1,2, Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis1, Richard Beare2,3

  • 1Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Human Brain Mapping
|February 9, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Automated brain imaging segmentation in Huntington's disease (HD) shows FreeSurfer may be best for amygdala volume analysis, despite overestimation bias. Manual segmentation remains most accurate for group differences.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Computational Anatomy

Background:

  • Smaller amygdala volumes correlate with poorer motor and cognitive function in Huntington's disease (HD).
  • Manual segmentation is accurate but time-consuming for large cohorts.
  • Automated segmentation accuracy for the amygdala in HD is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of three automated brain imaging segmentation methods for the amygdala in Huntington's disease.
  • To compare FreeSurfer, FIRST, and ANTS nonlinear registration followed by FIRST segmentation for amygdala volume analysis in HD.
  • To identify the most suitable automated method for large-scale HD neuroimaging studies.

Main Methods:

  • T1-weighted MRI data from 35 presymptomatic HD, 36 symptomatic HD, and 34 healthy controls (IMAGE-HD cohort) were analyzed.
  • Amygdalae were segmented using FreeSurfer, FIRST, and a combination of ANTS nonlinear registration with FIRST.
  • Automated segmentations were compared against manual segmentations using Dice overlap scores and statistical group differentiability.

Main Results:

  • All automated methods overestimated amygdala volumes compared to manual segmentation.
  • No significant differences in Dice overlap scores were found between the automated methods.
  • Manual segmentation showed the greatest statistical differentiation between groups, followed by FreeSurfer, then ANTS/FIRST; FIRST alone did not differentiate groups.
  • Automated methods exhibited a bias of increased overestimation for smaller amygdalae, most pronounced in FIRST and moderate in ANTS/FIRST, but subtle in FreeSurfer.
  • FreeSurfer introduced an 8% hemispheric bias, overestimating right amygdala volume compared to manual segmentation.

Conclusions:

  • FreeSurfer demonstrated the most favorable performance among the tested automated methods for amygdala segmentation in HD, despite inherent biases.
  • Automated segmentation, particularly FreeSurfer, may be viable for distinguishing amygdala volume differences in large HD cohorts.
  • Careful consideration of segmentation method biases and accuracy is crucial for reliable neuroimaging research in neurodegenerative diseases like HD.

Related Concept Videos