Shunt intention during carotid endarterectomy in the early symptomatic period and perioperative stroke risk

Scott R Levin1, Alik Farber1, Philip P Goodney2

  • 1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Journal of Vascular Surgery
|February 10, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after stroke showed no difference in stroke risk. Routine shunting by surgeons who typically use shunts yielded better outcomes than selective shunting.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • The necessity of planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) following a recent stroke remains a subject of debate.
  • Understanding shunting practices and their impact on postoperative outcomes is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between different shunting strategies and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing CEA within 14 days of an ipsilateral stroke.
  • To compare outcomes based on whether surgeons planned to shunt versus not to shunt.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2018) for CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke.
  • Categorization of surgeons based on their planned shunting approach: routine shunting, selective shunting for preoperative indications, selective shunting for intraoperative indications, or no shunting.
  • Comparison of outcomes using univariable and multivariable analyses.

Main Results:

  • Out of 5683 CEAs, 56.1% involved planned shunting. Patients planned for shunting were more likely to have severe contralateral stenosis and receive general anesthesia.
  • Multivariable analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day stroke risk between planned shunting and no planned shunting (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82-1.67).
  • Selective shunting for preoperative (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63) or intraoperative indications (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.86-6.01) was associated with increased stroke risk compared to no shunting.

Conclusions:

  • Prospective planning for shunting versus not shunting during CEA after acute stroke does not alter postoperative stroke risk.
  • Shunting is not always necessary, and outcomes are better when performed routinely by surgeons accustomed to its use, rather than selectively based on intraoperative or preoperative indications.
Abstract