Shunt intention during carotid endarterectomy in the early symptomatic period and perioperative stroke risk
Scott R Levin1, Alik Farber1, Philip P Goodney2
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Insights
Planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after stroke showed no difference in stroke risk. Routine shunting by surgeons who typically use shunts yielded better outcomes than selective shunting.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- The necessity of planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) following a recent stroke remains a subject of debate.
- Understanding shunting practices and their impact on postoperative outcomes is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between different shunting strategies and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing CEA within 14 days of an ipsilateral stroke.
- To compare outcomes based on whether surgeons planned to shunt versus not to shunt.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2018) for CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke.
- Categorization of surgeons based on their planned shunting approach: routine shunting, selective shunting for preoperative indications, selective shunting for intraoperative indications, or no shunting.
- Comparison of outcomes using univariable and multivariable analyses.
Main Results:
- Out of 5683 CEAs, 56.1% involved planned shunting. Patients planned for shunting were more likely to have severe contralateral stenosis and receive general anesthesia.
- Multivariable analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day stroke risk between planned shunting and no planned shunting (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82-1.67).
- Selective shunting for preoperative (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63) or intraoperative indications (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.86-6.01) was associated with increased stroke risk compared to no shunting.
Conclusions:
- Prospective planning for shunting versus not shunting during CEA after acute stroke does not alter postoperative stroke risk.
- Shunting is not always necessary, and outcomes are better when performed routinely by surgeons accustomed to its use, rather than selectively based on intraoperative or preoperative indications.
Objective:
Whether recent stroke mandates planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is controversial. Our goal was to determine associations of various shunting practices with postoperative outcomes of CEAs performed after acute stroke.
Methods:
The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2018) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days of an ipsilateral stroke. Surgeons who prospectively planned to shunt either shunted routinely per their usual practice or shunted selectively for preoperative indications. Surgeons who prospectively planned not to shunt either shunted selectively for intraoperative indications or did not shunt. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared shunting approaches.
Results:
There were 5683 CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke. Surgeons planned to shunt in 56.1% of cases. Patients whose surgeons planned to shunt vs planned not to shunt were more likely to have severe contralateral stenosis (8.8% vs 6.9%; P = .008), to receive general anesthesia (97.5% vs 89.1%; P < .001), and to undergo conventional CEA (94% vs 81.8%; P < .001). Unadjusted outcomes were similar between the cohorts for operative duration (124.3 ± 48.1 minutes vs 123.6 ± 47 minutes; P = .572) and 30-day stroke (3.4% vs 3%; P = .457), myocardial infarction (1.1% vs 0.8%; P = .16), and mortality (1.6% vs 1.3%; P = .28). On multivariable analysis, planning to shunt vs planning not to shunt was associated with similar risk of 30-day stroke (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.67; P = .402). On subgroup analysis, in 38.4% patients, no shunt was placed, whereas the remainder received routine shunts (44.4%), preoperatively indicated shunts (11.6%), and intraoperatively indicated shunts (5.5%). Compared with no shunting, shunting by surgeons who routinely shunt was associated with a similar stroke risk (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.91-2.13; P = .129), but shunting by surgeons who selectively shunt on the basis of preoperative indications (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63; P = .007) or intraoperative indications (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.86-6.01; P < .001) was associated with increased stroke risk. Prior coronary revascularization independently predicted increased intraoperatively indicated shunting (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.8; P = .022).
Conclusions:
In CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke, there is no difference in postoperative stroke risk when surgeons prospectively plan to shunt or not to shunt. Shunting is often not necessary; however, when shunting is performed, routine shunters achieve better outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management


