Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

VCTS chart evaluation as a screening test.

P C Maudgal1, R W Stout, A T van Balen

  • 1Free University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Not Available].

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2016
Same author

Prepupillary pseudophakos and iseikonization.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2016
Same author

Evaluation of three feed-through insecticides using two rodent and two sand fly species as models.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association·2013
Same author

Oral treatment of rodents with fipronil for feed-through and systemic control of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).

Journal of medical entomology·2013
Same author

Laboratory evaluation of rubidium as a long-lasting marker for bloodfeeding sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).

Journal of medical entomology·2012
Same author

Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and its active metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide after a single intravenous administration in chickens (Gallus domesticus) anesthetized with isoflurane.

Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics·2012
Same journal

Effects of short-term moderate versus high intraocular pressure elevation on flicker-induced changes in full-field electroretinogram.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

The relationship between foveal anatomy and retinal function in oculocutaneous albinism.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Early onset primary angle closure and foveal retinoschisis associated with a pseudo-homozygous CRB1 pathogenic variant.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Bilateral perifoveal macular ischemia in non-proliferative Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated retinopathy: a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Association between dynamic pupil parameters and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Structure-function relationship between handheld photopic negative response and macular GCIPL thickness in chronic optic neuropathy.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

The Vision Contrast Test System (VCTS) chart is not a reliable tool for diagnosing cataracts or glaucoma in clinical practice. This study found the VCTS chart frequently led to incorrect diagnoses or failed to detect these common eye conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Contrast sensitivity testing is crucial for detecting visual impairments.
  • The Vision Contrast Test System (VCTS) chart is marketed as a screening tool for visual disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the VCTS chart.
  • To determine if the VCTS chart is a valuable screening device in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Contrast sensitivity curves were generated for 211 patients using the VCTS chart.
  • Patients were categorized based on VCTS chart results according to manufacturer instructions.
  • VCTS diagnoses were compared against clinical examinations.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The VCTS chart yielded false diagnoses for cataract in 65.5% of patients.
  • False diagnoses for glaucoma were identified in 54.2% of patients.
  • The VCTS chart failed to detect existing cataracts or glaucoma in some patients.

Conclusions:

  • The VCTS chart demonstrates significant inaccuracy in diagnosing cataracts and glaucoma.
  • The VCTS chart lacks clinical value as a screening device due to high rates of misdiagnosis.
  • Clinical practice should not rely on the VCTS chart for effective eye condition screening.