Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Comparison of the current international guidelines on the management of HCC
Friedrich Foerster1, Peter Robert Galle1
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany.
Insights
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management guidelines from American, Asian Pacific, and European societies are compared. This review highlights consensus, divergences, and future research directions for HCC treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Oncology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly complex.
- Major hepatology societies develop evidence-based guidelines for HCC treatment.
- Recent updates from American, Asian Pacific, and European societies necessitate comparative analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the latest HCC management guidelines from three major international societies.
- To identify commonalities and discrepancies in recommendations.
- To pinpoint areas requiring further research for future guideline revisions.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of published guidelines from the American, Asian Pacific, and European hepatology societies.
- Systematic review of key recommendations and differences.
- Identification of emerging research trends impacting HCC management.
Main Results:
- Significant overlap exists in core recommendations across the compared HCC guidelines.
- Notable differences are observed in specific treatment modalities and staging considerations.
- Several areas of active research are identified, suggesting imminent needs for guideline updates.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians benefit from understanding the nuances between major HCC guidelines.
- Ongoing research is crucial for refining HCC management strategies and future guideline development.
- Harmonization of guidelines may be facilitated by addressing identified research gaps.
Abstract:
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become ever more demanding. To evaluate the available evidence and to give clinicians the best guidance, all major hepatology societies have developed guidelines for HCC. Recently, updated versions have been published by the American, the Asian Pacific, and the European societies. This article presents a comparison of these three guidelines summarising both common ground and differences. Moreover, it highlights areas of ongoing research which will make yet another round of updates of the guidelines necessary in the near future.
More Related Videos
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
10:35Generation of Subcutaneous and Intrahepatic Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Xenografts in Immunodeficient Mice
Published on: September 25, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow