Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
Published on: February 21, 2015
Critical exon indexing improves clinical interpretation of copy number variants in neurodevelopmental disorders
E Robert Wassman1, Karen S Ho1, Diana Bertrand1
1Lineagen Inc. (E.R.W., K.S.H., D.B., K.W.D., M.M.M., S.P., A. Peiffer, A. Prasad, M.A.S., H.T., R.V., C.H.H.); Life Designs Ventures (E.R.W.), Park City, UT; Department of Pediatrics (K.S.H., A. Peiffer), University of Utah; The Centre for Applied Genomics (S.W.S., M.U.), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Program in Genetics and Genome Biology (S.W.S), The Hospital for Sick Children; McLaughlin Centre (S.W.S), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Molecular Genetics (S.W.S), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
To evaluate a new tool to aid interpretation of copy number variants (CNVs) in individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities.
Methods:
Critical exon indexing (CEI) was used to identify genes with critical exons (CEGs) from clinically reported CNVs, which may contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The 742 pathogenic CNVs and 1,363 variants of unknown significance (VUS) identified by chromosomal microarray analysis in 5,487 individuals with NDDs were subjected to CEI to identify CEGs. CEGs identified in a subsequent random series of VUS were evaluated for relevance to CNV interpretation.
Results:
CEI identified a total of 2,492 unique CEGs in pathogenic CNVs and 953 in VUS compared with 259 CEGs in 6,965 CNVs from 873 controls. These differences are highly significant (p < 0.00001) whether compared as frequency, average, or normalized by CNV size. Twenty-one percent of VUS CEGs were not represented in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, highlighting limitations of existing resources for identifying potentially impactful genes within CNVs. CEGs were highly correlated with other indices and known pathways of relevance. Separately, 136 random VUS reports were reevaluated, and 76% of CEGs had not been commented on. In multiple cases, further investigation yielded additional relevant literature aiding interpretation. As one specific example, we discuss GTF2I as a CEG, which likely alters interpretation of several reported duplication VUS in the Williams-Beuren region.
Conclusions:
Application of CEI to CNVs in individuals with NDDs can identify genes of potential clinical relevance, aid laboratories in effectively searching the clinical literature, and support the clinical reporting of poorly annotated VUS.
More Related Videos
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
05:51A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
Published on: June 15, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Genome Copying Errors