Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

05:53
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
10.5K
Association analysis of loci implied in "buffering" epistasis
Antonio Reverter1, Zulma G Vitezica2, Marina Naval-Sánchez1
1CSIRO Agriculture & Food, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Journal of Animal Science
|February 13, 2020
Summary
Researchers developed a new quantitative genetics model to identify genetic loci involved in buffering effects. This method simplifies detecting epistasis and reveals significant buffering loci in cattle, offering new insights into evolutionary and quantitative genetics.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Buffering mechanisms in biological networks enhance robustness through evolution.
- Existing methods lack explicit ways to identify loci involved in buffering.
- Buffering can be conceptualized as interactions within the genetic background.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a tractable quantitative genetics model for identifying buffering loci.
- To simplify the detection of epistasis (gene-gene interactions) from quadratic to linear complexity.
- To apply the model to identify buffering loci in bovine populations.
Main Methods:
- Developed a linear model condensing buffering effects into a single statistical effect.
- Constructed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) model to estimate multiplicative epistatic effects.
- Utilized a variance components, norm reaction model with likelihood ratio tests for significance.
Main Results:
- Identified significant buffering loci in Brahman and Tropical Composite cattle that lack significant additive effects.
- Found buffering epistatic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near genes associated with fertility, growth, coat characteristics, and heat resistance.
- Highlighted loci with significant epistatic but non-significant additive effects, previously unreported or associated with selection signatures.
Conclusions:
- The developed model effectively identifies loci with buffering effects, offering new perspectives in evolutionary and quantitative genetics.
- Studying buffering loci can address challenges in genetic variance, adaptation, and marker effect variability across different genetic backgrounds.
- The findings provide a promising new approach for understanding the genetic basis of adaptation and robustness.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis Analysis
5.6K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
5.6K
Epistasis
49.9K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
49.9K
Punnett Squares
124.7K
Overview
124.7K
Genetic Lingo
113.3K
Overview
113.3K
Dihybrid Crosses
80.6K
Overview
80.6K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
75.8K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
75.8K

