Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Precise Phage Mutagenesis with NgTET-Assisted CRISPR-Cas Systems
Published on: October 14, 2025
Comparison of CRISPR and Marker-Based Methods for the Engineering of Phage T7
Aurelija M Grigonyte1, Christian Harrison2, Paul R MacDonald3
1Warwick Integrative Synthetic Biology Centre (WISB) and School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL Coventry, UK.
Abstract:
With the recent rise in interest in using lytic bacteriophages as therapeutic agents, there is an urgent requirement to understand their fundamental biology to enable the engineering of their genomes. Current methods of phage engineering rely on homologous recombination, followed by a system of selection to identify recombinant phages. For bacteriophage T7, the host genes cmk or trxA have been used as a selection mechanism along with both type I and II CRISPR systems to select against wild-type phage and enrich for the desired mutant. Here, we systematically compare all three systems; we show that the use of marker-based selection is the most efficient method and we use this to generate multiple T7 tail fibre mutants. Furthermore, we found the type II CRISPR-Cas system is easier to use and generally more efficient than a type I system in the engineering of phage T7. These results provide a foundation for the future, more efficient engineering of bacteriophage T7.
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR and crRNAs
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
DNA Bacteriophages
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
CRISPR

