Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Transmucosal Emergence Geometry and Peri-Implant Diseases Prevalence Around Bone- and Tissue-Level Implants: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

Oral wound healing in the elderly: Mechanisms, challenges, and innovations.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same author

Consensus Report of Group 1 of the 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Number of Implants, Timing of Implant Placement and Loading.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

Clinician- and patient-reported outcomes following the surgical treatment of single gingival recession defects: A systematic review.

Periodontology 2000·2025
Same author

Long-term outcomes of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation and alveolar ridge reconstruction followed by delayed implant placement: A systematic review.

Periodontology 2000·2025
Same author

Aesthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry: Consensus Report.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

In Vivo Assessment of Alveolar Macrophage Efferocytosis Following Ozone Exposure
08:54

In Vivo Assessment of Alveolar Macrophage Efferocytosis Following Ozone Exposure

Published on: October 22, 2019

9.5K

Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

G Avila-Ortiz1, M Gubler1,2, M Romero-Bustillos1

  • 1Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Journal of Dental Research
|February 14, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) therapy effectively maintains alveolar bone volume after tooth extraction compared to unassisted healing. ARP reduces the need for further bone augmentation for dental implants.

Keywords:
alveolar bone atrophybone graft(s)clinical studies/trialsdental implantsdigital imaging/radiologytooth loss

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.9K
Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues
06:16

Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues

Published on: April 26, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

In Vivo Assessment of Alveolar Macrophage Efferocytosis Following Ozone Exposure
08:54

In Vivo Assessment of Alveolar Macrophage Efferocytosis Following Ozone Exposure

Published on: October 22, 2019

9.5K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.9K
Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues
06:16

Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues

Published on: April 26, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Oral Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Tooth extraction leads to alveolar bone resorption, complicating subsequent tooth replacement.
  • Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) aims to mitigate post-extraction bone loss.
  • Predicting bone resorption based on local factors is crucial for treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of ARP with unassisted socket healing (EXT) in preserving alveolar bone volume.
  • To evaluate the influence of baseline buccal bone thickness on alveolar bone resorption.
  • To assess clinical, volumetric, implant-related, and patient-reported outcomes after ARP.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 53 subjects undergoing tooth extraction.
  • Experimental group received ARP with bone allograft and a membrane; control group had extraction only.
  • Assessments included linear and volumetric bone changes, soft tissue contour, need for augmentation, and patient discomfort over 14 weeks.

Main Results:

  • ARP significantly reduced volumetric bone resorption compared to EXT (-8.36% vs. -15.83%).
  • Baseline buccal bone thickness was a significant predictor of bone resorption in both groups.
  • ARP reduced the need for additional bone augmentation for implant placement (11.5% vs. 48.1%).

Conclusions:

  • ARP therapy is more effective than unassisted healing in preserving alveolar bone volume post-extraction.
  • ARP can decrease the necessity for subsequent bone augmentation procedures, facilitating implant placement.
  • While soft tissue contour and patient discomfort were comparable, ARP offers significant bone preservation benefits.